Long ago I just did it myself. The libraries that get fancy tended to rely on stuff that I couldn't be sure existed or at least would existed in the future. Not to mention that a console app should be pretty simple in the first place. If you need complex user interactions then a console app probably isn't the way. If I didn't want a normal UI then I would be more likely to control it via either command line options and/or configuration files. Actually I have been doing just those for years without any need for anything else.

I don't GET it.

thanks. CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair

Quote: The explainer is authored by four Googlers, including at least one person on Chrome's "Privacy Sandbox" team, which is responding to the death of tracking cookies by building a user-tracking ad platform right into the browser. And yet many people still think it was a movement for their (people's) sick :doh: :sigh: :sigh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Never fear, Glenn is here. :bob: help you! Dabble is correct, I am trying to convince people they are actually using NFC while they claim to be using RFID. NFC as other have said is a short range protocol for reading and writing data between a tag. I think there are limits imposed on the range you can operate at. I'm fairly sure these are imposed by the power applied to the antenna. I'm more an expert on RFID though. If I can help I will...

This is going to be important ! «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

Hi Kent, Well, i just finished a "probe" of the new tuned for programming beta Ai in Resharper, where i said: create a c# list of type for all members of the hominid species extinct and living. followed by: comment the list with name of family followed by: make the list into a dictionary and, the AI spake thus: Dictionary hominidSpecies = new Dictionary { {"Homo Sapiens", "Hominidae"}, // Modern Humans {"Homo Neanderthalensis", "Hominidae"}, // Neanderthals, extinct {"Homo Erectus", "Hominidae"}, // Extinct species of archaic humans {"Homo Habilis", "Hominidae"}, // Extinct species of archaic humans {"Homo Heidelbergensis", "Hominidae"}, // Extinct species of archaic humans {"Homo Naledi", "Hominidae"}, // Recently discovered species, extinct {"Homo Floresiensis", "Hominidae"}, // The "Hobbit", extinct {"Pan Troglodytes", "Hominidae"}, // Common Chimpanzee {"Pan Paniscus", "Hominidae"}, // Bonobo or Pygmy Chimpanzee {"Gorilla Gorilla", "Hominidae"}, // Western Gorilla {"Gorilla Beringei", "Hominidae"}, // Eastern Gorilla {"Pongo Pygmaeus", "Hominidae"}, // Bornean Orangutan {"Pongo Abelii", "Hominidae"}, // Sumatran Orangutan {"Pongo Tapanuliensis", "Hominidae"} // Tapanuli Orangutan }; that ... looks kind of "mature" to me ... i had not "primed it" by any content related to Linnean taxonomy. «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

Possibly VS is maintaining a history of your code completion, so on starting down a code line you have previously completed with the aid of cc, it infers from that history that you probably want to write something similar? Sort of like a word-wheel, where as you type possible matches to your part-typed word are displayed.

Done, and I'll try and get the fix deployed soon. cheers Chris Maunder

That's not refactoring! Refactoring is the process of restructuring code, while not changing its original functionality. The goal of refactoring is to improve internal code by making many small changes without altering the code's external behavior. You need to find out what the new process involves, and upgrade the code to be compliant. At a guess, Google will have a list of changes that need to be made - I'd start there, or ask their tech support. "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

Kent Sharkey wrote: Now even more GPT than before! :jig: Wohooo :jig: ...NOT M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

v1 - CodeProject[^] M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Closing the stream - my bad, I added it prematurely. :doh: Please disregard my suggestion to close the request stream before sending the request or add it after the stream were read. (401) Unauthorized response, it seems that your server did not accept the given credentials as valid. - There are a few things you can try. Make sure that the API you are accessing is expecting basic authentication and that the credentials should be provided in the Authorization header. If the API expects a different authentication method, such as API keys or OAuth, you will need to adjust your authentication to accept the request as per their requirements. Check that the API endpoint you are using (https://api.dev.name.com/v4/domains) is 100% correct. To isolate or debug the issue, you could try using a different client, such as cURL or Postman, with the same credentials and endpoint. This might help determine if the problem lies with the code or if there might be an issue with the credentials or API itself. Check your API documentation to make sure that you are following the correct authentication process and that there are no additional steps required. Hope this points you in the right direction.

Yes, got it... thanks :) Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon

Based on Accept purchase - FONDY Documentation[^] I think you are not setting the signature correctly. based on your code you set signature wrong, I think, it's hard to read. They are expecting a sha1 hash of password|amount|currency|merchant_id|order_id|order_desc. Maybe I am not reading your post correctly because it is all lumped together, but it seems to me that the problem is the signature is not being set to a sha1 hash of those items based on result_2 = cursor.fetchone() and signature = str(result_2[0]) it is set to payment_id.