trønderen wrote: I wonder if anyone ever has remembered to write the conditional backwards, yet used '=' rather than '=='. My impression is that those who turns the condition around never mixes up assignment and equality operators. Right. However I sometimes make a typo. Quote: I prefer the natural way of writing conditionals,emphasizing readability over dogmas Me too. Luckily, modern compilers produce a warning. "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

Exactly! The officer needs to know how many men are available (a platoon of one wouldn't perform well either). He could have asked, "How many are available?" But he didn't (in this example). Presumably he can see there's no one there, so he effectively asked, "Is this everyone in the platoon?" The correct answer at that point is "Yes", at which point he knows what he has to work with (even if it's zero). To answer No at this point would imply that there are others who are not present, which isn't the case. If we were to write that in code, it would be Platoon.AreAllPresent(), and the result would be True as long as no members of the Platoon are absent (even if there are no members of the Platoon).

Thanks for the article. I did happen to read that article when trying to research a problem that I'm having with the out-of-process designer! The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

Hey everyone! We’ve got a new mod menu app for Mobile Legends: Bang Bang that can help you out. It’s called “NP Modz” and “Naruto PH Modz”. You np modz can grab the APK file from our site. Stick around to learn more about this app and what it can do.

Is this one related? : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73402437/empty-toolbox-in-visual-studio-2022-for-net-6-0-winforms-and-control-library-pr[^]

Well aren't you just the most delightful ... :)

Might it be that they try to bloat the software so that people needs to buy new hardware every couple years? M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Thanks to all for replying! Found this for commenting methods: CodeDocumentor - Visual Studio Marketplace[^] It appears when you move the mouse over the method name (with intelli sense) /// /// Get hand trump cards. /// /// The trump card ID. /// \]\]> public List GetHandTrumpCards(int TrumpCardID)

You still can edit it but it invalidates the signature - makes sense. Never tried it before, thanks for uncovering another detail. Mircea

My fruit hate has evolved over time. I went from never in my house to my daughter having one. I still have zero interest for myself and will rib my coworkers about it. Just the same, use what makes you happy. Just don't tell me how awesome your fruit is while booted into a Windows VM to get work done : ;P Hogan

Richard MacCutchan wrote: relevant to VS either From the post "when I then pull my internal nuget into a project," I figured that mean using a project via VS. One can manage them outside of VS but I doubt many people do. Certainly I would presume that most do it in VS so that is how I read it.

Start the install and then go to lunch. Take your time at lunch as it took nearly an hour for this upgrade to complete.

My experience is the same, but there is always the chance of things going wrong.

Okay, I follow you now. They tend to hide behind other vendors if they are spending $$. But the developers tend to play around, and licensing of this sort is so far off the radar... Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

I have low level ways to activate the cores without a scheduler. Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

So.... Environment.Exit([exit_code]); ?? Not on this yet, but soon enough. Real soon, if I have it my way. I think it does that abstraction to help with the way it facades for running services in local debug without them actually being services? It seems like we DIY'd that into the old stuff.