Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. help with homework

help with homework

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpquestionlounge
24 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Daniel Wilson

    You're right. I didn't go through and calculate .444 but the equation above it is correct. Out of curiosity how might you calculate this without using Bayes theorem? Saying "use Bayes theorem" is kinda redundant... or at least it is to me as I can't think of another way to approach it.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brakanjan
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Daniel Wilson wrote: Saying "use Bayes theorem" is kinda redundant just a helpful hint, I suppose. tx:)

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B brianwelsch

      Not to mention the possibility that you pick up an apple masquerading as an orange. Those fruit can be wile, you know. BW CP Member Homepages


      "Miraculous you call it babe? You ain't seen nothing yet.
      They got Pepsi in the Andes. They got McDonalds in Tibet"

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Neville Franks
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Or you may have a rotten apple.:-D Neville Franks, Author of ED for Windows www.getsoft.com and coming soon: Surfulater www.surfulater.com

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Daniel Wilson

        You're right. I didn't go through and calculate .444 but the equation above it is correct. Out of curiosity how might you calculate this without using Bayes theorem? Saying "use Bayes theorem" is kinda redundant... or at least it is to me as I can't think of another way to approach it.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Daniel Turini
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Daniel Wilson wrote: or at least it is to me as I can't think of another way to approach it. There's always the Monte Carlo approach... :-D Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Daniel Wilson

          You're right. I didn't go through and calculate .444 but the equation above it is correct. Out of curiosity how might you calculate this without using Bayes theorem? Saying "use Bayes theorem" is kinda redundant... or at least it is to me as I can't think of another way to approach it.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Andy Brummer
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters.

          L D D 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • B Brakanjan

            Hi Could you guys check if my homework is correct: Q A box (A) contains 8 apples and 4 oranges Another box (B) containes 10 apples and 2 oranges A fruit is picked from a random box, and found to be an apple. what is the chance of this apple comming from box A. Use Bayes theorem. scroll down for my answer A: 8/12 * 1/2 ---------------------- 8/12 * 1/2 + 10/12 * 1/2 = 0.444

            T Offline
            T Offline
            tidge
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            The true answer is that there is no apple.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B brianwelsch

              42 BW CP Member Homepages


              "Miraculous you call it babe? You ain't seen nothing yet.
              They got Pepsi in the Andes. They got McDonalds in Tibet"

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Brian Delahunty
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              I just saw this thread now and I was about to answer with that. :-) Regards, Brian Dela :-) http://www.briandela.com IE 6 required.
              http://www.briandela.com/pictures Now with a pictures section :-D
              http://www.briandela.com/rss/newsrss.xml RSS Feed

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Andy Brummer

                There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                andy brummer wrote: My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters. ...and wait for the computer (and illiterate users...) beat you at the game :) My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Brakanjan

                  Hi Could you guys check if my homework is correct: Q A box (A) contains 8 apples and 4 oranges Another box (B) containes 10 apples and 2 oranges A fruit is picked from a random box, and found to be an apple. what is the chance of this apple comming from box A. Use Bayes theorem. scroll down for my answer A: 8/12 * 1/2 ---------------------- 8/12 * 1/2 + 10/12 * 1/2 = 0.444

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  leppie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  You cant compare oranges to apples! top secret

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Andy Brummer

                    There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Daniel Turini
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    andy brummer wrote: There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) You can make it sound more impressive calling it "the Monte Carlo statistical modelling" (I'm serious) :) Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski

                    D A 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • A Andy Brummer

                      There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Daniel Wilson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      In this case they are one in the same since there isn't a bias towards one basket. 8/12 * 1/2 24 ---------------------- * ----- 8/12 * 1/2 + 10/12 * 1/2 24 = 8 --- 18 = .444

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Brakanjan

                        Daniel Wilson wrote: Saying "use Bayes theorem" is kinda redundant just a helpful hint, I suppose. tx:)

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Daniel Wilson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        I guess technically we are both wrong since .444 isn't the "right" answer but instead .4444444 with 4 repeating ad infinitum but I can figure out how to put a line above the 4. ;P

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Daniel Turini

                          andy brummer wrote: There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) You can make it sound more impressive calling it "the Monte Carlo statistical modelling" (I'm serious) :) Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Daniel Wilson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Again I am amazed by the power of marketing. :-D

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Brian Delahunty

                            I just saw this thread now and I was about to answer with that. :-) Regards, Brian Dela :-) http://www.briandela.com IE 6 required.
                            http://www.briandela.com/pictures Now with a pictures section :-D
                            http://www.briandela.com/rss/newsrss.xml RSS Feed

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            brianwelsch
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Great names think alike. BW CP Member Homepages


                            "Miraculous you call it babe? You ain't seen nothing yet.
                            They got Pepsi in the Andes. They got McDonalds in Tibet"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Daniel Turini

                              andy brummer wrote: There is always brute force. Calculate all posibilities and just count apples and oranges. (or boxes in this case.) You can make it sound more impressive calling it "the Monte Carlo statistical modelling" (I'm serious) :) Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Andy Brummer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              That's the lazy version. Monte Carlo only calculates some of the results and then assumes all the rest are the same. It's great using statistics to calculate statistical results. There's a 20% chance that there is a 30% chance that it was the second box. My goal is to look at code like a chessmaster looks at a chessboard to see positions and possibilites beyond lines and characters.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Brakanjan

                                Hi Could you guys check if my homework is correct: Q A box (A) contains 8 apples and 4 oranges Another box (B) containes 10 apples and 2 oranges A fruit is picked from a random box, and found to be an apple. what is the chance of this apple comming from box A. Use Bayes theorem. scroll down for my answer A: 8/12 * 1/2 ---------------------- 8/12 * 1/2 + 10/12 * 1/2 = 0.444

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Orhun Birsoy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                0.5 It is either from box A or not.;P

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups