SOOOOO SLOOOOWWWWW

[Tim Smith]

Dundas's web site is ok. (That is assuming that the server is in the same area as Dundas's other servers.) Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

[David Cunningham]

We're hand checking machines for the virus now (but I'm sure we have it). David

[Lost User]

The site is very fast when I use 'codetools.com' instead of 'codeproject.com'. Try this out. -Thomas

[Josh Knox]

:-D Josh josh@that-guy.net

[Anders Molin]

Yep, it's a lot faster now that it was just half an hour ago... :) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

[David Cunningham]

Yep, we had 3 boxes that slipped through our standard checks. We've taken them down and will now disinfect them. Sorry guys. David

[David Wulff]

I noticed that too. Now I always try codetools.com if codeproject.com times out, and nine times out of ten it works. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

[Anders Molin]

It really sounds strange, both DNS records points at the same ip-address........ - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

[David Cunningham]

Yes, it does sound weird, I can't think of any reason why the performance between the two would differ, it's the same chain all the way through...:confused: David

[Anders Molin]

I can imagine a setup where there might be a difference... Lets say the server uses several "virtual webservers" on the same ip. then it looks at the headers of the http request, and say something like: "Ahaa, a request for codeproject.com, that's for web05. And now one for codetools, that's for web06" You know what I mean? (I dont remember the technically terms right now ;) ) Now, if web05 and web06 points to the same path on the disk, but web05 runs as "in process IIS process" and web06 runs as "protected IIS process", web05 would be a lot faster... - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"