Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger

EU Software Patent Law Said in Danger

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javahtmlcomtutorialquestion
24 Posts 9 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Corinna John

    http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a.QckuA8V3H8&refer=home[^] Everything will go on as it does today (every EU member country has its own laws about patents), there'll be no software patents in general. :) _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

    V Offline
    V Offline
    Vikram A Punathambekar
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Somehow, your subject line reminded me of the Deus Ex Machina from Revolutions. :rolleyes: BTW, good news. Cheers, Vikram.


    http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "I don't have time to read all that, but I do believe those stats to be ludicrous." — Stan Shannon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V Vikram A Punathambekar

      TonyJ wrote: I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents Do you mean to say you're an American who's sick of some of the silly SW patents? :) There are lots of people on CP who're not native speakers of English, and I can understand it when they make mistakes. But when native English speakers make glaring errors or use 'gangsta spelling', it p*sses me off. :doh: Cheers, Vikram.


      http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      T Jenniges
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Vikram, Let us all bow down to your superior intellect and master spelling abilities. Could it be that I know the difference between "who's" and "whose" and made a mistake while writing fast and multi-tasking. You are an ass! Go screw your goat! Any mistakes here?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Vikram A Punathambekar

        TonyJ wrote: I'm an American whose sick of some of the silly SW patents Do you mean to say you're an American who's sick of some of the silly SW patents? :) There are lots of people on CP who're not native speakers of English, and I can understand it when they make mistakes. But when native English speakers make glaring errors or use 'gangsta spelling', it p*sses me off. :doh: Cheers, Vikram.


        http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." - gantww.

        T Offline
        T Offline
        T Jenniges
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        By the way I've never seen the contraction "who're" before. Maybe you were thinking of your mother when you invented that word. Look it up on dictionary.com if you need help. I can't stand people who correct other's grammar and then are foolish enough to make a mistake while doing so.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Corinna John

          Are you sure you're on topic? The directive that is likely to be cancelled today is only about patents on computer programs. _________________________________ Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Absolutely - the patent in question was not a specific algorithm, but a style of writing code. It sounded to me like a design pattern more than anything. so imagine if a design pattern could be copyrighted, it would be the same as copyrighting the fact that petrol burns. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups