Roguewave/Stingray not to move tools to .NET
-
-
Well, what else did you expect? Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic -
No, but they upgrade the tools to support VC 7 (that's VC.NET) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
-
No, but they upgrade the tools to support VC 7 (that's VC.NET) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
Yeah, but they are still usin MFC for the UI portions and not the .NET UI classes Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
-
Yeah, but they are still usin MFC for the UI portions and not the .NET UI classes Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
Yup, do you really see that as a bad thing? I really don't want to use VC for managed code, I want to compile native code because it runs faster, and works on peoples computers without they have to download 19MB runtime... - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
-
Yeah, but they are still usin MFC for the UI portions and not the .NET UI classes Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
Of course, it is an MFC Extension library so what else would they be using. The article only seems to be referring to a minor upgrade to support the changes in VC++7. When they produce a .NET extension package, it'll be a new package coz that way they can make more money :-) Michael :-)
-
Of course, it is an MFC Extension library so what else would they be using. The article only seems to be referring to a minor upgrade to support the changes in VC++7. When they produce a .NET extension package, it'll be a new package coz that way they can make more money :-) Michael :-)
Michael P Butler wrote: When they produce a .NET extension package, it'll be a new package coz that way they can make more money Yeah, I guess so :-) Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
-
Yup, do you really see that as a bad thing? I really don't want to use VC for managed code, I want to compile native code because it runs faster, and works on peoples computers without they have to download 19MB runtime... - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
Anders Molin wrote: Yup, do you really see that as a bad thing No, I dont. Not at all. But since you said VC.NET I wrongly interpreted that to mean that you were implying that they were using the .NET UI classes. My mistake :-) Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
-
Anders Molin wrote: Yup, do you really see that as a bad thing No, I dont. Not at all. But since you said VC.NET I wrongly interpreted that to mean that you were implying that they were using the .NET UI classes. My mistake :-) Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: My mistake Not quite so, Nish. I also sometime think many VC++ users will be confused with that .NET term at the end of VS or VC in the new version, especially when these developers will primarily be using Visual Studio only for MFC/ATL developments. // Fazlul
Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com
-
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: My mistake Not quite so, Nish. I also sometime think many VC++ users will be confused with that .NET term at the end of VS or VC in the new version, especially when these developers will primarily be using Visual Studio only for MFC/ATL developments. // Fazlul
Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com
:-) Thanks I think people should use the term VC 7 when they refer to MFC/ATL and they should use the term VC.NET when they are referring to Managed C++ Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org Nish is a BIG fan of Goran Ivanisevic
