Public domain or Inexpensive stock photos?
-
Have you looked at http://www.istockphoto.com/[^]
My: Blog | Photos "Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucious
I just took a look at http://www.istockphoto.com/[^]and if you read through the content license, it appears you can download pictures for your own use, but not for templates that are for resale.:sigh: HunterSvcs - If only it would work the first time :=)
-
I just took a look at http://www.istockphoto.com/[^]and if you read through the content license, it appears you can download pictures for your own use, but not for templates that are for resale.:sigh: HunterSvcs - If only it would work the first time :=)
huntersvcs wrote:
you can download pictures for your own use, but not for templates that are for resale
To me that would seem acceptable. I guess what they need is a non-royalty free way of doing that. Since it is only $1 to $3 per image it wouldn't be a huge burden. However, given their delivery mechanism I think it would be hard for them to control that.
My: Blog | Photos "Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucious
-
I am in the process of building a bunch of web templates and in need of some graphics. I was planning on using some of the photos from my Hemera Photo Objects collection, but after reading the licensing, it is prohibited for web template distribution. Does anyone know of decent free or very inexpensive photo libraries out there that do not have these restrictive licenses? Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
You can try deviantART.com it's not actually a stock, but they have millions (really!) entries. Usually the authors need to be notified when you use their photos, but they don't need to be paid. ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA] - eMule Server .NET
-
You can try deviantART.com it's not actually a stock, but they have millions (really!) entries. Usually the authors need to be notified when you use their photos, but they don't need to be paid. ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA] - eMule Server .NET
http://www.deviantart.com/[^] ;) BW
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
-- Steven Wright -
I am in the process of building a bunch of web templates and in need of some graphics. I was planning on using some of the photos from my Hemera Photo Objects collection, but after reading the licensing, it is prohibited for web template distribution. Does anyone know of decent free or very inexpensive photo libraries out there that do not have these restrictive licenses? Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
Not free, but good quality, and lots to choose from: http://www.comstock.com/[^] Jon Sagara Look at him. He runs like a Welshman. Doesn't he run like a Welshman? Doesn't he? I think he runs like a Welshman. Sagara.org | Blog | My Articles
-
You can try deviantART.com it's not actually a stock, but they have millions (really!) entries. Usually the authors need to be notified when you use their photos, but they don't need to be paid. ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA] - eMule Server .NET
Actually, from what I can find, you are responsible for making copyright arranges with each and every photo you use, which may or may not include payments. There is no applied license to any of the work on the site. Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
-
I am in the process of building a bunch of web templates and in need of some graphics. I was planning on using some of the photos from my Hemera Photo Objects collection, but after reading the licensing, it is prohibited for web template distribution. Does anyone know of decent free or very inexpensive photo libraries out there that do not have these restrictive licenses? Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
stock.xchng is down at the moment but will hopefully be back up soon. The terms on each photo were set by the author; many of them were free for personal use but I remember seeing some that were free for commercial use as well. No idea whether they flat-out prohibited redistribution or left it up to the author. James
-
I am in the process of building a bunch of web templates and in need of some graphics. I was planning on using some of the photos from my Hemera Photo Objects collection, but after reading the licensing, it is prohibited for web template distribution. Does anyone know of decent free or very inexpensive photo libraries out there that do not have these restrictive licenses? Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
You can use the Creative Commons search at Flickr[^] to find available photographs. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
-
You can use the Creative Commons search at Flickr[^] to find available photographs. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
Yeah, not really easy to give credits on commerical website templates. Sure would be nice to find public domain work to use. I would think with all the digital cameras out there, we would have at least one decent public domain photo gallery. There is also the problem of model releases with many people submiting photos that do not obtain them. Sure is a lot of hassle :) Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
-
Yeah, not really easy to give credits on commerical website templates. Sure would be nice to find public domain work to use. I would think with all the digital cameras out there, we would have at least one decent public domain photo gallery. There is also the problem of model releases with many people submiting photos that do not obtain them. Sure is a lot of hassle :) Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]
Which is why good photos normally cost money :) And you can find Creative Commons photos that don't require attribution. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
-
Which is why good photos normally cost money :) And you can find Creative Commons photos that don't require attribution. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
Paul Watson wrote:
Which is why good photos normally cost money
So far the only ones I can find range at above $80 per picture without the ability to modify which is not reality with website templates.
Paul Watson wrote:
And you can find Creative Commons photos that don't require attribution.
Did not see that on the link you provided. Do you happen to know how to search for them? Rocky <>< Latest Post: Help Google index your site! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]