I Am the Very Model of a Modern Major Minor Revision Build
-
Marketing isn't fluff. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
Paul Watson wrote:
Marketing isn't fluff.
Something too many "geeks" seem to not get at all...
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
Paul Watson wrote:
Remember; we geeks are few
but we are strong[^] Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
:laugh: Nice one regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
-
Marketing isn't fluff. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
Paul Watson wrote:
Marketing isn't fluff.
No, it has a much stronger odor. Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power Eric Hoffer All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke
-
Paul Watson wrote:
Remember; we geeks are few
but we are strong[^] Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
:-D Nice one, Chris.
Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
Chaps, a programming question. Versioning. Is it:
- Major. Minor. Revision. Build
- Major. Minor. Build. Revision
and why? I've always put build last and it literally just counts the numer of builds. Revision to me is for minor bug fixes and is a developer set number (unlike build.) So why does .NET 2.0 and other systems put Build before Revision? regards, Paul Watson Ireland Colib and ilikecameras. K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
We use Major. Minor. Revision. Build. Build numbers are incremental and unique across all versions of a product, so if someone asks about "Build x" we know exactly which one it is (no "is it 1.0.2.x you mean, of 1.1.0.x?"). The Revision field is only incremented for public releases. So, now that we've just publicly released Visual Lint 1.0.0.40, the next public release will be a 1.0.1.x, which internal development carries on with the next version - 1.1.0.x. That scheme worked well enough at Sonardyne for a team of 10 that its more than good enough for us in our present embryonic state! :laugh: Anna :rose: Currently working mostly on: Visual Lint :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.