Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Another Silly puzzle

Another Silly puzzle

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncom
51 Posts 19 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Somanova420

    Wow, I like read that exact same page off a Google search.:laugh:

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Russell Morris
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Somanova420 wrote:

    Wow, I like read that exact same page off a Google search

    I spent the first 20 minutes poking through Wolfram's mathweb stuff, trying to decide what type of series it was. It wasn't until I stumbled upon the Wikipedia page for series that it listed this series as the harmonic series, along with approximations. I got a solid A on this stuff in CalcIII back in college - now I'm looking at it through what seems to be foggy, frosted glass only a handful of years later :-O -- Russell Morris Morbo: "WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Losinger

      Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

      That works on the vacuum principle too, eh?

      a wing will create small pockets of (partial) vacuum as air moves around it. it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Phil J Pearson
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Chris Losinger wrote:

      (partial) vacuum

      My Physics teacher would have ranted at you! "Vacuum is a total absence of air. How can you have a partial total absence? You mean 'a pocket of lower air pressure'" Phil

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Raj Lal

        1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Maxwell Chen
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        http://www.math.com/tables/expansion/power2.htm[^]


        Maxwell Chen

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Raj Lal

          1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Maxwell Chen
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Summation applet[^]. 1) Click the [Applet] button, a popup window is seen. 2) Input 1/(n+1), 3) Click [Auto] button. :-D [Edit] Ouch! Overflow ... ;P [/Edit]


          Maxwell Chen

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Phil J Pearson

            Chris Losinger wrote:

            (partial) vacuum

            My Physics teacher would have ranted at you! "Vacuum is a total absence of air. How can you have a partial total absence? You mean 'a pocket of lower air pressure'" Phil

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            Phil J Pearson wrote:

            My Physics teacher would have ranted at you!

            i would've ranted back. ;) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Maxwell Chen

              http://www.math.com/tables/expansion/power2.htm[^]


              Maxwell Chen

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bob Flynn
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              That's not the answer to the question.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Bob Flynn

                That's not the answer to the question.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Maxwell Chen
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                Bob Flynn wrote:

                That's not the answer to the question.

                It is! See the 1st raw in the table.


                Maxwell Chen

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Maxwell Chen

                  Bob Flynn wrote:

                  That's not the answer to the question.

                  It is! See the 1st raw in the table.


                  Maxwell Chen

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bob Flynn
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  Yes, I saw it. It said that the sum goes to infinity as n goes to infinity. But the question was when does the sum reach 100? If ever. You definitely got the "if ever part", but that left the much more difficult problem of what is the value of n when the sum equals 100.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bob Flynn

                    Yes, I saw it. It said that the sum goes to infinity as n goes to infinity. But the question was when does the sum reach 100? If ever. You definitely got the "if ever part", but that left the much more difficult problem of what is the value of n when the sum equals 100.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    I order of magnituded the eta for 100 here. Unless there's an analytical method getting a precise value is impossible since bruteforce isn't an option. http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=1480757&forumid=1159#xx1480757xx

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nish Nishant

                      Quartz... wrote:

                      Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it?

                      We blow the air away creating a small vacuum pocket and a fire cannot burn in a vacuum. That's my guess anyway :-) Regards, Nish


                      Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                      The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Bob X
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

                      We blow the air away creating a small vacuum pocket and a fire cannot burn in a vacuum. That's my guess anyway

                      Sorry. You cannot blow into an area and create a vacumm caused by no matter in an area. This is physically impossible through the laws of physics. Carbon Dioxide doesn't put out the flame either because your breath contains a large amount of oxygen in it. If I remember correctly, the flame goes out due to over supplying oxygen to the flame. Similar to why an airplane engine will stall if you make the fuel too rich.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Raj Lal

                        1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Raj Lal
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        The real solution is here [^] --- My Unedited article^

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups