MO FOs DONE JACKED ME
-
michael vick is already a millionaire, what reason would he have to kill the family pet?
[Insert Witty Sig Here]
VonHagNDaz wrote:
michael vick is already a millionaire, what reason would he have to kill the family pet?
Idiots never do anything within reason.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
financial statements and check books
At least you won't have to worry about identity fraud. But you should have them hidden (locked) away as they are potentially more lucrative to a criminal than your household goods.
Red Stateler wrote:
broke a high definition projector
Criminals are clumsy and stupid. Trust your insurance cover was (is) new for old.
-
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Come on, Red, where's your personal responsibility? I hope you're not going to allow the insurance company to pay for it, meaning the policyholders are subsidizing your lack of basic security.
I voluntarily pay the insurance company handsomely to mitigate my risk such that if an event like this occurs, the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders. That is a prudent and age-old concept of which I approve of greatly and I challenge you to find a statement where I say otherwise. Anybody who does not have adaquete insurance or who is not otherwise self-insured is, quite frankly, a fool.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
You moved to the 'burbs to escape crime, yet you have been victimized and I have not. Ironic, don'cha think?
No I didn't. I live in an urban area, genius.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Typical of a victim of property crime, you are trying to insult those that took advantage of you by critiquing their choices in stolen items,technique, etc. This is typical victim mentality, trying to find some superiority for yourself in a situation where you have clearly been treated as inferior.
Or rather a typical mentality of somebody who has been so thoroughly lashed to reach for some reason to find me inferior to you. Yes, I was quite astonished at the stupidity of their choices and mentioned it to the cop. He agreed that those types of people tend to be "idiots". Say, are you a burgler?
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Good luck getting your precious police force to track down the stolen property or make any leads on the case!
Since I am prudently insured, there is no need to and that does not offend my sensibilities in the least. But just for fun, I'm going to request a tape from our gate's security camera to see if I can find a suspicious license plate or two. I'll be sure to pay special attention to ratty cars with anti-Bush bumper stickers.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Perhaps if you had focused more of your time and energy on people (yourself, your fellow citizens, your family) instead of property, you couldn't have had so much taken away from you so easily.
You're quite a naive fool. Perhaps you didn't notice above that I don't have any emotional attachment to my property. My first concern was the safety of
Red Stateler wrote:
the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders
Sounds like socialism to me!
Red Stateler wrote:
Yes, I was quite astonished at the stupidity of their choices and mentioned it to the cop.
I have had numerous conversations with victims of property crime and they all sound the same: "They took my CDs, but not my Best Buy gift card! Idiots!". Of course, the real idiot is the person that is missing their CDs, and the victim knows this.
Red Stateler wrote:
Since I am prudently insured, there is no need to and that does not offend my sensibilities in the least.
Who cares if there's a criminal out there? As long as you get your money! Forget about who else may be victimized or hurt by a burgular, as long as you get your check, right?
Red Stateler wrote:
Perhaps you didn't notice above that I don't have any emotional attachment to my property.
Oh no, of course not, you were not upset in the least at getting ripped off for seven grand.
Red Stateler wrote:
I intend to. Right after I join the NRA. They possibly just got themselves a new member.
Too bad you hadn't bought the guns before you got robbed, so that the thief could have taken those too! Funny how you have a delusion that a gun would have solved your problem. Or are you afraid you'll be such a safe and comfortable sleeper that your wife will have to wake you up by shooting off a couple of rounds? You're hilarious, oh of course you're not worried or upset, you are just going out to buy some guns, everybody does that when they're bored. I am sorry you got robbed, honestly, it is very stressful and can worry you for your safety. However, you deserve it, so I am conflicted. :confused:
-
What a disgustingly personal attack. You are a despicable person.
I am just making fun of Red for getting robbed, nothing despicable about that. It's not like I am attributing a political ideology of someone who endangered the safety of my family for attention on the internet or anything. Cheers!
-
I've heard about robbers letting pit bulls into houses with dogs to kill the dog before going in to rob the house. So not only is your stuff stolen, you have to clean up the bloody remains of the family dog.
This blanket smells like ham
My family dog is a pit bull. We also have a Jack Russell. Both of whom constantly train under the table and through the chairs. They have the advantage of knowing the territory.
This statement was never false.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders
Sounds like socialism to me!
Red Stateler wrote:
Yes, I was quite astonished at the stupidity of their choices and mentioned it to the cop.
I have had numerous conversations with victims of property crime and they all sound the same: "They took my CDs, but not my Best Buy gift card! Idiots!". Of course, the real idiot is the person that is missing their CDs, and the victim knows this.
Red Stateler wrote:
Since I am prudently insured, there is no need to and that does not offend my sensibilities in the least.
Who cares if there's a criminal out there? As long as you get your money! Forget about who else may be victimized or hurt by a burgular, as long as you get your check, right?
Red Stateler wrote:
Perhaps you didn't notice above that I don't have any emotional attachment to my property.
Oh no, of course not, you were not upset in the least at getting ripped off for seven grand.
Red Stateler wrote:
I intend to. Right after I join the NRA. They possibly just got themselves a new member.
Too bad you hadn't bought the guns before you got robbed, so that the thief could have taken those too! Funny how you have a delusion that a gun would have solved your problem. Or are you afraid you'll be such a safe and comfortable sleeper that your wife will have to wake you up by shooting off a couple of rounds? You're hilarious, oh of course you're not worried or upset, you are just going out to buy some guns, everybody does that when they're bored. I am sorry you got robbed, honestly, it is very stressful and can worry you for your safety. However, you deserve it, so I am conflicted. :confused:
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Red Stateler wrote: the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders Sounds like socialism to me!
How is risk redistribution equivalent to wealth redistribution? Since when did socialists advocate risk redistribution? In your unmitigated zeal to attack him, you only managed to spout off nonsense. :rolleyes: The rest of your rant is rather uninteresting and is just a personal attack on Red. Replace the scenario of getting robbed with getting in a car accident (oh yeah, I'm a real idiot for getting hit head on by a drunk driver!) and you'll see how silly you're being.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders
Sounds like socialism to me!
Red Stateler wrote:
Yes, I was quite astonished at the stupidity of their choices and mentioned it to the cop.
I have had numerous conversations with victims of property crime and they all sound the same: "They took my CDs, but not my Best Buy gift card! Idiots!". Of course, the real idiot is the person that is missing their CDs, and the victim knows this.
Red Stateler wrote:
Since I am prudently insured, there is no need to and that does not offend my sensibilities in the least.
Who cares if there's a criminal out there? As long as you get your money! Forget about who else may be victimized or hurt by a burgular, as long as you get your check, right?
Red Stateler wrote:
Perhaps you didn't notice above that I don't have any emotional attachment to my property.
Oh no, of course not, you were not upset in the least at getting ripped off for seven grand.
Red Stateler wrote:
I intend to. Right after I join the NRA. They possibly just got themselves a new member.
Too bad you hadn't bought the guns before you got robbed, so that the thief could have taken those too! Funny how you have a delusion that a gun would have solved your problem. Or are you afraid you'll be such a safe and comfortable sleeper that your wife will have to wake you up by shooting off a couple of rounds? You're hilarious, oh of course you're not worried or upset, you are just going out to buy some guns, everybody does that when they're bored. I am sorry you got robbed, honestly, it is very stressful and can worry you for your safety. However, you deserve it, so I am conflicted. :confused:
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Sounds like socialism to me!
That's because you're an idiot. Socialism is a government-sponsored compulsory "social" service, whereas insurance is a private risk-mitigation via distribution tool. Medicare is a socialist insurance program. Insurance is not socialist.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I have had numerous conversations with victims of property crime and they all sound the same: "They took my CDs, but not my Best Buy gift card! Idiots!". Of course, the real idiot is the person that is missing their CDs, and the victim knows this.
So you revere thiefs and condemn their victims. How utterly unsurprising! And at the same time reprehensible.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Oh no, of course not, you were not upset in the least at getting ripped off for seven grand.
Actually, no I wasn't because, as I said, I have insurance because I'm not a fool. I was upset that somebody entered my house and, had my wife been home at the time, a much more vial crime than theft could have ensued. Of course you are a vial person (something entirely predictable, since you're a leftist) and would probably want something vial to happen to others. You are a disgusting person.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Too bad you hadn't bought the guns before you got robbed, so that the thief could have taken those too! Funny how you have a delusion that a gun would have solved your problem. Or are you afraid you'll be such a safe and comfortable sleeper that your wife will have to wake you up by shooting off a couple of rounds? You're hilarious, oh of course you're not worried or upset, you are just going out to buy some guns, everybody does that when they're bored.
I would have absolutely no problem with my wife placing a bullet square between the eyes of an intruder if I weren't there. My only regret would be the mess I'd have to clean up.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I am sorry you got robbed, honestly, it is very stressful and can worry you for your safety. However, you deserve it, so I am conflicted.
No you're not. You can't make two consecutive posts relishing in the fact that the only reason my wife was not assaulted or worse was that she was not home at the time. You can't call people who were robbed "idiots" because someone robbed them and then
-
I am just making fun of Red for getting robbed, nothing despicable about that. It's not like I am attributing a political ideology of someone who endangered the safety of my family for attention on the internet or anything. Cheers!
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I am just making fun of Red for getting robbed, nothing despicable about that.
That's because you're one of the most worthless members of our society.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
"Criminals are clumsy and stupid." Does that mean Red is a criminal?
If he was, would that put a damper on your feelings for him? :laugh:
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
"Criminals are clumsy and stupid." Does that mean Red is a criminal?
If you're trying to say that I'm clumsy and stupid, then your remark would only follow if he had said "The clumsy and stupid are criminals". But your response makes the following true: "Kyle is stupid".
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
"Criminals are clumsy and stupid." Does that mean Red is a criminal?
If you're trying to say that I'm clumsy and stupid, then your remark would only follow if he had said "The clumsy and stupid are criminals". But your response makes the following true: "Kyle is stupid".
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
"Criminals are clumsy and stupid." Does that mean Red is a criminal?
If he was, would that put a damper on your feelings for him? :laugh:
-
My family dog is a pit bull. We also have a Jack Russell. Both of whom constantly train under the table and through the chairs. They have the advantage of knowing the territory.
This statement was never false.
Yeah, I realized after I sent the reply that I had typed pit bull. I think the article I read specifically mentioned the breed of the dogs, but that really isn't important. I had a pit bull for a pet growing up and they are great dogs. What is more common is people that get "guard" dogs keeping them alone outside and then deprive them of pack contact turning them into an animal that is more likely to bite.
This blanket smells like ham
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
Probably not, seeing how the "feelings i have for him" are those of laughing at him.
Oh come on now...we all know you're infatuated with him. On another note - you mentioned something about your astronomy work being published in a NASA report or something. Got the reference for that? I'd be interested to see it.
-
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Red Stateler wrote: the cost of that risk is distributed accross policy holders Sounds like socialism to me!
How is risk redistribution equivalent to wealth redistribution? Since when did socialists advocate risk redistribution? In your unmitigated zeal to attack him, you only managed to spout off nonsense. :rolleyes: The rest of your rant is rather uninteresting and is just a personal attack on Red. Replace the scenario of getting robbed with getting in a car accident (oh yeah, I'm a real idiot for getting hit head on by a drunk driver!) and you'll see how silly you're being.
73Zeppelin wrote:
How is risk redistribution equivalent to wealth redistribution?
How much risk is the check for, Red?
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
But surely you see I was making a satire of your type of logic?
Hardly. You weren't responding to me. You're just stupid. That's all.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
How is risk redistribution equivalent to wealth redistribution?
How much risk is the check for, Red?
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
How much risk is the check for, Red?
He's not "Red", genius.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Sounds like socialism to me!
That's because you're an idiot. Socialism is a government-sponsored compulsory "social" service, whereas insurance is a private risk-mitigation via distribution tool. Medicare is a socialist insurance program. Insurance is not socialist.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I have had numerous conversations with victims of property crime and they all sound the same: "They took my CDs, but not my Best Buy gift card! Idiots!". Of course, the real idiot is the person that is missing their CDs, and the victim knows this.
So you revere thiefs and condemn their victims. How utterly unsurprising! And at the same time reprehensible.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Oh no, of course not, you were not upset in the least at getting ripped off for seven grand.
Actually, no I wasn't because, as I said, I have insurance because I'm not a fool. I was upset that somebody entered my house and, had my wife been home at the time, a much more vial crime than theft could have ensued. Of course you are a vial person (something entirely predictable, since you're a leftist) and would probably want something vial to happen to others. You are a disgusting person.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
Too bad you hadn't bought the guns before you got robbed, so that the thief could have taken those too! Funny how you have a delusion that a gun would have solved your problem. Or are you afraid you'll be such a safe and comfortable sleeper that your wife will have to wake you up by shooting off a couple of rounds? You're hilarious, oh of course you're not worried or upset, you are just going out to buy some guns, everybody does that when they're bored.
I would have absolutely no problem with my wife placing a bullet square between the eyes of an intruder if I weren't there. My only regret would be the mess I'd have to clean up.
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I am sorry you got robbed, honestly, it is very stressful and can worry you for your safety. However, you deserve it, so I am conflicted.
No you're not. You can't make two consecutive posts relishing in the fact that the only reason my wife was not assaulted or worse was that she was not home at the time. You can't call people who were robbed "idiots" because someone robbed them and then
Red Stateler wrote:
That's because you're an idiot.
Have you noticed I am not responding to your juvenile ad-hominem attacks? Is that getting frustrating yet?
Red Stateler wrote:
So you revere thiefs and condemn their victims.
No I don't, I just don't participate in the delusion that you have somehow gotten over on the thief because he didn't steal the really good stuff.
Red Stateler wrote:
I would have absolutely no problem with my wife placing a bullet square between the eyes of an intruder if I weren't there. My only regret would be the mess I'd have to clean up.
Try again, this is in no way a response to the very valid points I brought up.
Red Stateler wrote:
No you're not.
Yes, actually I am. That's the difference between you and me, Spendbot.
Red Stateler wrote:
You can't make two consecutive posts relishing in the fact that the only reason my wife was not assaulted or worse was that she was not home at the time.
Because you could have done nothing to stop your wife from getting assaulted if you were there, right? You failed to protect your posessions, take some personal responsibility, man. Next you'll be blaming me somehow.
Red Stateler wrote:
You are, as I've said before and you're demonstrating now, a very lowly and classless person.
Wow, that really hits close to the bone. Still interested in an update on my sex life, Captain Classy? Or are you too busy carrying water for a president on a murderous rampage that has cost a hundred thousand lives and half a trillion dollars?
-
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
I am just making fun of Red for getting robbed, nothing despicable about that.
That's because you're one of the most worthless members of our society.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Maybe you should attend some counseling, to help you get over the feeling of being a victim. Then you wouldn't need to try to make others feel worthless. I can tell you this, unlike you I still have everything I had when I got up yesterday! Have fun filling out paperwork and investigating strange noises for the next few days!
-
IamChrisMcCall wrote:
How much risk is the check for, Red?
He's not "Red", genius.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
I was talking to you, because I knew you'd read the post, hence addressing you by name, gorgeous. Next time I will thoroughly explain myself so you can read it through the tears you're spilling over being victimized like a punk.