Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Mac Development

Mac Development

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
swiftvisual-studiojavascriptrubyios
24 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Shog9 0

    Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

    I am not sure how many people will get impressed by the following syntax:

    Named parameters. I love 'em. Started writing a simple CAD program on OS/2 using Objective C (GCC) long before i ever took C++ seriously (never finished it though; the environment was sadly lacking when it came to OS/2 GUI dev). :sigh:

    Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

    One thing though, I once considered that VS is the best IDE available. Now after being exposed to IDE's such as XCode, Eclipse and NetBeans, I don't think it is true anymore. It is amazing how different IDEs have come close to VS and some are even better than VS.

    You know, i'm not entirely convinced that IDEs in general are a good end when it comes to working with non-trivial projects. In some ways, i guess i'm realizing how much i've lost by allowing myself to become accustom to using VS for everything. There was a time when the first thing i'd do on a new project was write a set of scripts and MAKEFILEs to automate building, testing, and putting together an installation. Now i set up a VS project and do the rest manually... The former is a good deal quicker than dealing with make, but with the rest it just might be a net loss. :~

    Citizen 20.1.01

    'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

    S Offline
    S Offline
    SchneiderIS
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I too used to be a VS addicted individual. When I bought my MacBook Pro I found I could still use VS (through Virtual Machine) running it better on the Mac than it ran on the PC based solution. I had experience with Eclipse though and one of the things that I liked with it was the ability to use the scripts of past. In fact that is one of the many real strengths in my opinion. So much so that I have made a concerted effort that future development will not happen in VS when and where ever possible.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

      It all started when my wife gifted me a new iMac on my birthday. At that time Mac was something new to me and for about a month I used it for VS development, launching VS on virtual machines. Then one day I became curious how I can develop a simple application for Mac. Then the iPhone SDK was released and I got deeper into iPhone and mac development. Initially, I resisted Objective-C, which is the primary development language for Mac. The syntax looked ugly to me. I am not sure how many people will get impressed by the following syntax: [rect setWidth:100 height:200]; But gradually as I understand more and more. I love Objective-C which is a combination of C and Small-talk. So it has the goodies of C and also that of dynamically typed languages such as Ruby and JavaScript. One thing though, I once considered that VS is the best IDE available. Now after being exposed to IDE's such as XCode, Eclipse and NetBeans, I don't think it is true anymore. It is amazing how different IDEs have come close to VS and some are even better than VS.

      You have, what I would term, a very formal turn of phrase not seen in these isles since the old King passed from this world to the next. martin_hughes on VDK

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Charles T II
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Interesting thread..I just bought a MacBook Pro last week to start working on a couple IPhone apps. At first, I didn't like the look of Objective-C. I'm actually starting to like it, but, I still feel like several aspects are a step backward. Working with raw pointers and having to manage memory just seems wrong these days :). I guess I've been spoiled too long by managed languages like C# and Java. I am actually writing this post from my MacBook. I also have Vista on here as well. I now only need to switch to Windows to work with Visual Studio and SQL Server. Everything else I need is on the Mac side (even Office)!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

        It all started when my wife gifted me a new iMac on my birthday. At that time Mac was something new to me and for about a month I used it for VS development, launching VS on virtual machines. Then one day I became curious how I can develop a simple application for Mac. Then the iPhone SDK was released and I got deeper into iPhone and mac development. Initially, I resisted Objective-C, which is the primary development language for Mac. The syntax looked ugly to me. I am not sure how many people will get impressed by the following syntax: [rect setWidth:100 height:200]; But gradually as I understand more and more. I love Objective-C which is a combination of C and Small-talk. So it has the goodies of C and also that of dynamically typed languages such as Ruby and JavaScript. One thing though, I once considered that VS is the best IDE available. Now after being exposed to IDE's such as XCode, Eclipse and NetBeans, I don't think it is true anymore. It is amazing how different IDEs have come close to VS and some are even better than VS.

        You have, what I would term, a very formal turn of phrase not seen in these isles since the old King passed from this world to the next. martin_hughes on VDK

        T Offline
        T Offline
        The Cake of Deceit
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Until it gets Microsoft .NET and VS with C# and VB, heck no. C and C++ (even managed) are ultra-ugly. That snippet made want to barf. X|

        CLR: Removes tough Java-based stains fast!

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T The Cake of Deceit

          Until it gets Microsoft .NET and VS with C# and VB, heck no. C and C++ (even managed) are ultra-ugly. That snippet made want to barf. X|

          CLR: Removes tough Java-based stains fast!

          T Offline
          T Offline
          The Cake of Deceit
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          I forgot something so hideous. UNIX.

          CLR: Removes tough Java-based stains fast!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups