Let's not forget that Jew-hatred is Jew-hatred

[73Zeppelin]

Ilíon wrote:

I seriously dislike misrepresentation; it's so like lying.

Then why do you do it so much?

[Matthew Faithfull]

I'd ask you to withdraw that in lieu of actually pointing out anything I've posted which can reasonably be considered nonsense or anti-American but your capacity for being resonable is not exactly legendary around here. You really want to pick your targets a little more carefully as I've hinted in the past. Questioning my Christianity without a very good reason is going to be really hard to back up, discourage me from bailing you out when you get out of your depth and can only end in me having to forgive you. I really don't think your reputation needs that kind of embarassment, do you?

"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

[73Zeppelin]

:laugh: If you post the link enough times, do you think you'll change the fabric of reality? Maybe God will help you out? It's simple, you were wrong from the start, you lied, you're still wrong now, you're lying, and you'll continue to lie and be wrong until you pull your head from your ass and buy a clue. :laugh: Anyways, at least I know I pissed you off royally by trivially showing how much of a moron you were. It eats at you, doesn't it? You just can't seem to let go. Get used to it, dullard. It's the theme of your existence. Thanks for the laughs and entertainment. You've amused everyone on this message board. :laugh:

[Ilion]

A personal vist from 73DipStick, the Liar-in-Chief[^] for all the Great Scientific "Minds" of CP's SoapBox!

[Ilion]

73DipStick, the Liar-in-Chief for all the Great Scientific "Minds" of CP's SoapBox will, of course, never actually admit that he caught his own tits in the wringer[^]. But that's OK ... *I* know it, *he* knows it (and knows that I know it), and anyone not a complete moron (and I seriously doubt there are any of those around here) knows it.

[73Zeppelin]

Why do you keep linking to your mistake? Are you proud of it? Everyone knows you don't understand the topic or the paper you linked to. Stop lying about me and stop lying about understanding the paper since you don't. You've been caught lying about 10+ times now (I've actually lost track). Liars always get caught. Didn't your parents teach you that? They probably did, but since you're a habitual liar the lesson didn't take.

[73Zeppelin]

Oh this is splendid. I really, really pissed you off! Too easy... Tell me how bad does it sting? Does it sting even worse now that you realize your lies didn't extricate you? Does it sting even more because you try and try and you still don't understand? What's it like? :laugh:

[Ilion]

73Zeppelin wrote:

Why do you keep linking to your mistake?

We *all* know that you caught your own tits in the wringer. We *all* know that your pathetic attempt to "humiliate" me backfired. We also all know that you and your Amen Chorus will never actually admit that it backfired. But that's a different matter.

[Rob Graham]

Ilíon wrote:

We *all* know that your pathetic attempt to "humiliate" me backfired.

You seem to be the only one of that opinion.

[Ilion]

You pathetic dreamer! :cool: You don't have the ability to piss me off.

[Ilion]

Rob Graham wrote:

You seem to be the only one of that opinion.

There is a great difference between publically admitting to an opinion and knowing it to be true. You (personally) are as much wedded to intentional public misrepresentation ... lying ... as the Great Dip himself is. Of course! you're not going to admit that you people caught your ownselves in your amusing "trap." And that's OK; you're still amusing. When you're not boring.

[73Zeppelin]

You still really don't know what the paper you linked to is about, do you? The paper is about surface deposition of hydrogen peroxide, it's not about atmospheric concentrations at all. Furthermore it's about surface deposition of H2O2 during "snowball" glacial periods. That's why the conclusion states: We have demonstrated here that the generation of H2O2 through photolytic processes involving H2O is possible in the oxygen-poor early atmosphere of the Archean and early Paleoproterozoic (45, 46). Large amounts of hydrogen peroxide can be preserved only under special conditions, such as during an intense glaciation. Because of the short atmospheric lifetime of H2O2 against UV photolysis, build-up of large amounts requires H2O2 production close to the ground (hence, under low-O2 conditions), as well as a mechanism to trap it in the ice to store and concentrate it. During an intense glaciation, particularly a Snowball event, the H2O2 deposition rate may have been enhanced greatly, as we discuss above, although our model is extremely simple and excludes many important considerations. A coupled chemistry (gas-phase and solid-state) and dynamics (climate and ice-sheet) model is needed to quantify our calculation in detail and to provide a more accurate and quantitative estimation of the deposition of hydrogen peroxide during glaciations in anaerobic atmospheres as well as Snowball Earth events. Anaerobic, since you are illiterate, means absence of oxygen. The authors are suggesting that during snowball events, the low temperatures allow for hydrogen peroxide to be fixed in the snow. The paper does not suggest that hydrogen peroxide photolysis leads to accumulation of atmospheric oxygen, liar. Your mistake was in not understanding this: a weak hydrological cycle coupled with photochemical reactions involving water vapor would give rise to the sustained production of hydrogen peroxide. The photochemical production of hydrogen peroxide has been proposed previously as the primary mechanism for oxidizing the surface of Mars. During a Snowball, hydrogen peroxide could be stored in the ice; it would then be released directly into the ocean and the atmosphere upon melting and could mediate global oxidation events in the aftermath of the Snowball, such as that recorded in the Fe and Mn oxides of the Kalahari Manganese Field, Read it again. It doesn't say what you think it says. Maybe you should spend less time reading the scribblings of liberal arts students over at wisegeek.

[73Zeppelin]

Ilíon wrote:

You pathetic dreamer! [Cool] You don't have the ability to piss me off.

You're lying again. You are clearly pissed off. You still continue to link back to the paper you don't understand which shows in plain text that you are still wrong. There, I pissed you off again. :laugh:

[Lost User]

Michael Martin wrote:

pointing out in a polite manner that you are halfway between a c*** and an arsehole

Doesnt that make him a kind og 'G-spot'?

Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

[Rob Graham]

And you don't realize when you are drowning in your own stupidity. Persistently flaunting your complete inability to understand the written word, you continue to smear yourself with your own mental excrement.

[Rob Graham]

fat_boy wrote:

that make him a kind og 'G-spot'?

You'd do well to check with your girl friend if that's where you think it's located.

[Lost User]

Rob Graham wrote:

You'd do well to check with your girl friend if that's where you think it's located.

Thats why I wrote 'kind of'. (It is by the way, if you didnt know it)

Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

[Lost User]

Ilíon wrote:

the irrational Jew-hatred so popular amongst leftish persons in Europe

you dont know what you are talking about.

Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

[73Zeppelin]

Matthew Faithfull wrote:

Questioning my Christianity without a very good reason is going to be really hard to back up, discourage me from bailing you out when you get out of your depth and can only end in me having to forgive you. I really don't think your reputation needs that kind of embarassment, do you?

Et tu Brute? :laugh:

[Ilion]

Rob Graham wrote:

And you don't realize when you are drowning in your own stupidity. Persistently flaunting your complete inability to understand the written word, you continue to smear yourself with your own mental excrement.

Ah! You clearly mistake me for one of your co-religionists[^]