Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Objects Folding in SQL SERVER petition...

Objects Folding in SQL SERVER petition...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpdatabasesql-serversysadminquestion
6 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    AlexCode
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi, I'm thinking about starting a petition demanding objects folding on SQL Server :laugh:. It would be greatly appreciated to be able to group objects inside folders having them separated hierarchically on the intellisence too (or simply on the object "namespace" like any other MS .net language. Grouping tables and specially storeds would make things a lot more readable and organized... would it be a gread deal of work to implement??? Any opinions on this? Thanks, Alex

    N R S S 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A AlexCode

      Hi, I'm thinking about starting a petition demanding objects folding on SQL Server :laugh:. It would be greatly appreciated to be able to group objects inside folders having them separated hierarchically on the intellisence too (or simply on the object "namespace" like any other MS .net language. Grouping tables and specially storeds would make things a lot more readable and organized... would it be a gread deal of work to implement??? Any opinions on this? Thanks, Alex

      N Offline
      N Offline
      NormDroid
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Good luck with the petition.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A AlexCode

        Hi, I'm thinking about starting a petition demanding objects folding on SQL Server :laugh:. It would be greatly appreciated to be able to group objects inside folders having them separated hierarchically on the intellisence too (or simply on the object "namespace" like any other MS .net language. Grouping tables and specially storeds would make things a lot more readable and organized... would it be a gread deal of work to implement??? Any opinions on this? Thanks, Alex

        R Offline
        R Offline
        RichardGrimmer
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        My thoughts exactly - sorry MS, but a filter doesn't even begin to address the problem lol

        C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A AlexCode

          Hi, I'm thinking about starting a petition demanding objects folding on SQL Server :laugh:. It would be greatly appreciated to be able to group objects inside folders having them separated hierarchically on the intellisence too (or simply on the object "namespace" like any other MS .net language. Grouping tables and specially storeds would make things a lot more readable and organized... would it be a gread deal of work to implement??? Any opinions on this? Thanks, Alex

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Shog9 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Eh? Can't you just come up with your own hierarchical naming scheme? I've yet to see a SQL editor from MS that does Intellisense, so it's not like that matters.

          Citizen 20.1.01

          'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A AlexCode

            Hi, I'm thinking about starting a petition demanding objects folding on SQL Server :laugh:. It would be greatly appreciated to be able to group objects inside folders having them separated hierarchically on the intellisence too (or simply on the object "namespace" like any other MS .net language. Grouping tables and specially storeds would make things a lot more readable and organized... would it be a gread deal of work to implement??? Any opinions on this? Thanks, Alex

            S Offline
            S Offline
            SimulationofSai
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            That's be a nice addition, but I've long since abandoned using the tree in Query explorer and management studio. I use the catalog views instead. They made some great improvements in the DB engine in 2005, and at the same time managed to make the new UI a disaster. :doh:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Shog9 0

              Eh? Can't you just come up with your own hierarchical naming scheme? I've yet to see a SQL editor from MS that does Intellisense, so it's not like that matters.

              Citizen 20.1.01

              'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

              A Offline
              A Offline
              AlexCode
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Having it grouped by a naming convention is just not enough for me. I like to have sp's named like: Get...; Save...; Update...; Create...; etc... I don't like to name the object and then it's functionality, I like to have the functionality first, like thinking: "I want to save a invoice" -> sp_SaveInvoice On this line of thinking I have all the Save's grouped and this is not cute to see. So if I could have a folder where I could place all my Invoicing sp logic it would be great, accessing it like: Exec AppDB.Invoicing.sp_SaveInvoice @1 @2... just like I do already in C# with my objects. For the intellisense you can download the SQL 2008 or download a trial of SQL Prompt from Red-Gate: http://www.red-gate.com/products/SQL_Prompt/index.htm[^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups