javascript bugs bug me.

ToddHileHoffer

As an asp.net programmer, I find the javascript bugs very, very annoying. Our payroll application made by JDE that have to use to fill out my time sheet. I have to keep clicking no to debug. I always fix my javascript bugs, but honestly I try to write as little JS as possible. I just write simple functions here and there. 99% of the javascript I use was written by someone else or is part of a framework (Telerik, AJAX, etc...). It is damn annoying how many websites do not clean up their javascript. It is just laziness.

I didn't get any requirements for the signature

Shog9 0

Michael A. Cochran wrote:

The "window.external.tran" evaluates to null in a script debugger.

There's a check before it is accessed:

if( window.external && window.external.tran )
a += "&tran=" + window.external.tran

So it really shouldn't be throwing an error. FWIW, here's your code snippet pretty-printed:

if(window.google)
window.google.report=function(d,c)
{
var a="";
{
if(window.google.pt)
{
a += "&srt=" + window.google.pt;
delete window.google.pt
}
if( window.external && window.external.tran )
a += "&tran=" + window.external.tran
}

  {
     var e= document.getElementById("csi");
     if(e.value)
        return

Michael A Cochran

Yeah, probably. Web development is surely one of the more mentally painful and frustrating fields of computer science. It can sometimes take days to do something in a web environment that would take 5 minutes in a WinForm environment. Try doing something like grab handles on an asp.net web page that uses webparts and making it layout correctly on even just the big three browsers (IE, FF, Safari) for example. Ouch. MAC

Michael A Cochran

But it is. And it's the check that fails. Technically, (and I wasn't trying to fix their code for them) it isn't a null reference exception. The error is "Element not found". Still, no doubt something that could be trapped and properly handled. MAC

Shog9 0

Michael A. Cochran wrote:

Still, no doubt something that could be trapped and properly handled.

Hard to say... window.external is (Internet Explorer's) means of exposing a host IDispatch[Ex] interface outside of the DOM to scripts. I have no idea what sort of extension provides tran, but if it isn't there (or is broken... or has been replaced with something else... and that something else is broken...) then all bets are off - it could be valid for the check and invalid for the access.

Michael A Cochran

Yeah. What set me off this evening is both CIO.com and zdnet.com throw several errors each. These two sites are often referenced in the Code Project daily news email. When I read this email, I always just click all the links I want at once, opening them in several tabs. With the script errors, you literally have to flip back and forth between the tabs, finding and clearing the error popups. It's a pain but I've been putting up with it for months. Guess I must have had a bad day today to make me say something about it. :-D

Jim Crafton

I'm pretty sure "Web development" and "computer science" in the same sentence is an oxymoron[^]!

¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

Michael A Cochran

I don't know what trans is either. But try...catch would probably catch it. Or they should find some other more reliable way of doing whatever it's doing. And this just started happening a few days ago. So this is fresh functionality. Google worked fine for me before so do I need whatever this is? Seems not. :~ So why not spend a little time and make sure the code works without irritating little popups? There's gotta be something they could do.

Jim Crafton

And people bitch about STL code being unreadable.

¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

Jim Crafton

You can solve part of your problem by skipping CIO.com and zdnet.com altogether. You'll get more informed news at uncov.com and theonion.com.

¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

Shog9 0

Michael A. Cochran wrote:

So why not spend a little time and make sure the code works without irritating little popups?

Beats me. Maybe it's working for them?

Shog9 0

;)

Michael A Cochran

:-D Yeah. We all use that one, don't we. :laugh:

Shog9 0

To be fair, that code looked like it had been minified (variable names shortened, whitespace removed) and i didn't do anything beyond adding whitespace to make it readable. But yeah, there's plenty of opportunity for dense code in JS... :)

JimmyRopes

Michael A. Cochran wrote:

Nope. IE7.

Therein lies your problem. :~

Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

Michael A Cochran

:laugh: It sure feels like it some days. Do web development for a while and you begin to long for the good old days when we did nothing but C and assembler programming. I once wrote a chess program for a 3270 using assembler. That was much more fun than trying to get web pages to layout correctly.

Michael A Cochran

:)

JoseMenendez

I really think that they should come up with something universal, like an Uniscript or something. It would really increase the happiness among us. :wtf:

Jm www.menendezpoo.com

Todd Smith

That's the reason I switched to Chrome. IE7- is just stupid in this regard.

Todd Smith

Member 96

:rolleyes: He's entirely right. I have debugging enabled in my development virtual machine in various browsers and there are almost no sites I go to with it that don't give javascript errors all over the place.

"It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson