Help me connect the dots
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Fairness Doctrine: Destroy outlets for opposing views.
Good God! Fearmongering over a non-issue. No hearings planned, no bills introduced, President opposes it.
BoneSoft wrote:
Census Move:
More fearmongering. Complete non-issue. The Census is not being removed from the Commerce Dept.
BoneSoft wrote:
Stimulus Bill:
Plenty of economists believe it will create lots of jobs and will stimulate the economy. Of course your article did include a number of economists who thought the stimulus is too small.
BoneSoft wrote:
with no compromise with those who represent damn near half of the nation
Oh boo-hoo. Cry me a river, Boney. There was compromise plenty of tax cuts in the stimulus. The R's offered nothing but opposition, they aren't interested in helping the economy they are listening to their new leader, Rush, who 'wants Obama to fail'.
BoneSoft wrote:
Gosh, it almost seems like Democrats ... How democratically American of them
Can't say I remember hearing you whine like this when the R's were talking about their permanent majority.
BoneSoft wrote:
Fact: Democrat = tax and spend
That's definitely more fiscally conservative than the R's borrow and spend mentality.
BoneSoft wrote:
Tax Americans who haven't been born yet to pay for his agenda (and hope his agenda doesn't kill too many unborn)
Oh my! Cry me another river, Boney! Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
Oh cry me a river, some filthy terrorists were waterboarded. I heard they even made them stay up late. :(( Boo hoo, the government listened to your phone calls. :(( You're turn. We were playing Obnoxious Partisan Trolling Antagonist, right? Still trying to get a handle on that whole debate thingy, huh.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Oh cry me a river, some filthy terrorists were waterboarded. I heard they even made them stay up late. :(( Boo hoo, the government listened to your phone calls. :(( You're turn. We were playing Obnoxious Partisan Trolling Antagonist, right? Still trying to get a handle on that whole debate thingy, huh.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
Way to be non-responsive. I win.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
Fairness Doctrine: Destroy outlets for opposing views.
Good God! Fearmongering over a non-issue. No hearings planned, no bills introduced, President opposes it.
BoneSoft wrote:
Census Move:
More fearmongering. Complete non-issue. The Census is not being removed from the Commerce Dept.
BoneSoft wrote:
Stimulus Bill:
Plenty of economists believe it will create lots of jobs and will stimulate the economy. Of course your article did include a number of economists who thought the stimulus is too small.
BoneSoft wrote:
with no compromise with those who represent damn near half of the nation
Oh boo-hoo. Cry me a river, Boney. There was compromise plenty of tax cuts in the stimulus. The R's offered nothing but opposition, they aren't interested in helping the economy they are listening to their new leader, Rush, who 'wants Obama to fail'.
BoneSoft wrote:
Gosh, it almost seems like Democrats ... How democratically American of them
Can't say I remember hearing you whine like this when the R's were talking about their permanent majority.
BoneSoft wrote:
Fact: Democrat = tax and spend
That's definitely more fiscally conservative than the R's borrow and spend mentality.
BoneSoft wrote:
Tax Americans who haven't been born yet to pay for his agenda (and hope his agenda doesn't kill too many unborn)
Oh my! Cry me another river, Boney! Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
oilFactotum wrote:
The Census is not being removed from the Commerce Dept.
Apparently Judd Greg Disagrees with you
oilFactotum wrote:
Can't say I remember hearing you whine like this when the R's were talking about their permanent majority.
and
oilFactotum wrote:
That's definitely more fiscally conservative than the R's borrow and spend mentality.
and
oilFactotum wrote:
Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
So are you saying that it was a good thing that the Republicans did this, or that it was a bad thing, but it still justifies the Democrats outspending them 2:1?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
The Census is not being removed from the Commerce Dept.
Apparently Judd Greg Disagrees with you
oilFactotum wrote:
Can't say I remember hearing you whine like this when the R's were talking about their permanent majority.
and
oilFactotum wrote:
That's definitely more fiscally conservative than the R's borrow and spend mentality.
and
oilFactotum wrote:
Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
So are you saying that it was a good thing that the Republicans did this, or that it was a bad thing, but it still justifies the Democrats outspending them 2:1?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
Oakman wrote:
Apparently Judd Greg Disagrees with you
Yeah, and? Given a choice of believing Greg saying what Obama is going to do and Obama saying what Obama is going to do - I guess I'll go with the person who is actually knows - in this case that would be Obama.
Oakman wrote:
So are you saying that it was a good thing that the Republicans did this
On the first two, I don't think it was good thing for the R's to try it - as far as I know the only place they did it was in Texas - pretty inconsequential. And, of course, there is no actual indication that the Dems are trying to steal the census - just the ranting of the lunatic fringe. I can't really see why you think that my statement that taxing and spending is more fiscally conservative than borrowing and spending would suggest that I think that borrowing and spending is a good thing all the time.
oilFactotum wrote:
Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
and this was a very bad thing, absolutely.
Oakman wrote:
but it still justifies the Democrats outspending them 2:1?
What justifies a large stimulus package is accepting the economic theory that government deficit spending in a recession will stimulate the economy and help soften the recession. Perhaps 800 billion is too much, more likely not enough. I'm not sure where you get the 2:1 ratio from, the Demint plan - which most R's supported - a grab bag of permanent tax cuts for the rich and businesses, would cost about 3.1 trillion over 10 years.
modified on Friday, February 13, 2009 10:01 PM
-
Way to be non-responsive. I win.
Go ahead and think that. But in reality, there's just really no point in responding to that kind of dishonest belligerent crap.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
-
Oakman wrote:
Apparently Judd Greg Disagrees with you
Yeah, and? Given a choice of believing Greg saying what Obama is going to do and Obama saying what Obama is going to do - I guess I'll go with the person who is actually knows - in this case that would be Obama.
Oakman wrote:
So are you saying that it was a good thing that the Republicans did this
On the first two, I don't think it was good thing for the R's to try it - as far as I know the only place they did it was in Texas - pretty inconsequential. And, of course, there is no actual indication that the Dems are trying to steal the census - just the ranting of the lunatic fringe. I can't really see why you think that my statement that taxing and spending is more fiscally conservative than borrowing and spending would suggest that I think that borrowing and spending is a good thing all the time.
oilFactotum wrote:
Where have you been the last 8 years when the R's have doubled the national debt?
and this was a very bad thing, absolutely.
Oakman wrote:
but it still justifies the Democrats outspending them 2:1?
What justifies a large stimulus package is accepting the economic theory that government deficit spending in a recession will stimulate the economy and help soften the recession. Perhaps 800 billion is too much, more likely not enough. I'm not sure where you get the 2:1 ratio from, the Demint plan - which most R's supported - a grab bag of permanent tax cuts for the rich and businesses, would cost about 3.1 trillion over 10 years.
modified on Friday, February 13, 2009 10:01 PM
Okay, I understand your thinking: Democrats walk on water; Republicans are the minions of hell. Do you have anything - anything - to say that is not summed up in the above executive summary?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Okay, I understand your thinking: Democrats walk on water; Republicans are the minions of hell. Do you have anything - anything - to say that is not summed up in the above executive summary?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
Oakman wrote:
I understand your thinking: Democrats walk on water; Republicans are the minions of hell.
Typical moronic drivel. But I've learned to expect nothing more from you. Sure I could be just like you, and Mike, and Stan, and Rob and Bone and parrot right-wing talking points ad infinitum, ad nauseum. But what would be the fun in that? Silly question, I know. Clearly you guys find great pleasure in it. I'll take a pass on that, though.
-
Go ahead and think that. But in reality, there's just really no point in responding to that kind of dishonest belligerent crap.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
dishonest belligerent crap
Look who's talking! :laugh: :rolleyes: Boney's dishonest belligerent crap[^]
-
Oakman wrote:
I understand your thinking: Democrats walk on water; Republicans are the minions of hell.
Typical moronic drivel. But I've learned to expect nothing more from you. Sure I could be just like you, and Mike, and Stan, and Rob and Bone and parrot right-wing talking points ad infinitum, ad nauseum. But what would be the fun in that? Silly question, I know. Clearly you guys find great pleasure in it. I'll take a pass on that, though.
oilFactotum wrote:
Typical moronic drivel.
Yes. I agree. I summed up your position perfectly. It's too bad, though. You sometimes show signs of a real mind with a better than average IQ - but the minute you start discussing politics you seem to lose any ability to think for yourself and sound like Nancy Pelosi instead.
oilFactotum wrote:
Sure I could be just like you, and Mike, and Stan, and Rob and Bone and parrot right-wing talking points ad infinitum, ad nauseum
Oily, your politics are so far to the left that Che Guevara would sound right wing next to you.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
oilFactotum wrote:
Typical moronic drivel.
Yes. I agree. I summed up your position perfectly. It's too bad, though. You sometimes show signs of a real mind with a better than average IQ - but the minute you start discussing politics you seem to lose any ability to think for yourself and sound like Nancy Pelosi instead.
oilFactotum wrote:
Sure I could be just like you, and Mike, and Stan, and Rob and Bone and parrot right-wing talking points ad infinitum, ad nauseum
Oily, your politics are so far to the left that Che Guevara would sound right wing next to you.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
Oakman wrote:
Yes. I agree.
I'm impressed, you've responded at the level of a 5th grader. Good for you!
Oakman wrote:
I summed up your position perfectly.
Sorry, wrong again. But, hey, you have a perfect record on that score.
Oakman wrote:
your politics are so far to the left
Perfectly wrong, once again.
-
BoneSoft wrote:
dishonest belligerent crap
Look who's talking! :laugh: :rolleyes: Boney's dishonest belligerent crap[^]
That wasn't dishonest, belligerent or crap. You're wasting your time, I'm not playing your little game troll. :(( :rolleyes:
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.