So I ask a programming question...
-
You really gotta try harder to keep up with everyone that's not on the short bus with you. In the lounge or the soapbox, i don't care about the votes, in the articles and the programming forums, I do. As far as *giving* votes, I doubt if I've handed out many more than a just couple of dozen message votes over the last eight years (if you don't count the "report this message" stuff). As far as how much WPF sucks, well, that's not even remotely related to this topic. So, try not to be distracted by shiny things while you're on this site. I'm really not in the mood to make sure everyone is reading from the same script...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
In the lounge or the soapbox, i don't care about the votes, in the articles and the programming forums, I do.
Well someone votes 1 or 2 and he/she explains why they did so, it helps to see where they coming from and opens a door for learning. If simply they leave 1 and walk out, too bad there is nothing helpful in that and I'd fail to see their point view, for that it does not bother me.
Yusuf Can I help you?
-
...in the WPF forum, and some 'tard 1-voted it. I didn't even bad-mouth WPF in it (I save that for The Lounge)...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
I didn't even bad-mouth WPF in it (I save that for The Lounge)...
That was your problem.. I think they thought someone else may have hi-jacked your account and posting under your name. Not enough bad mouthing of WPF!
-
I trimmed as much out of it as I dared to without losing context through omission. That is the nature of WPF. As it is, I had to gather all that crap from three different files - the state of WPF coding requirements certainly can't be blamed on me, nor can I be criticized for posting the code in question. At least it's in a frakking <PRE> tag. How many of the wanna-be programmers have used the <PRE> tag to format a code block here in the last 24 hours? Few, if any, besides me.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
How many of the wanna-be programmers have used the
tag to format a code block here in the last 24 hours? Few, if any, besides me.
So you finally admit it - you're a wanna-be programmer! :laugh: :laugh: :-D (okay that is a joke from what I've seen of your articles and posts here you seem to know your stuff)
-
Yeah, you and me both. Every time I find a bug in VS2008, or .NET, or anything else, I post about it here, and get a ton of 1 votes. No-one ever posts and says that the bug does not exist, but saying it does, gets me 1s
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. "I am new to programming world. I have been learning c# for about past four weeks. I am quite acquainted with the fundamentals of c#. Now I have to work on a project which converts given flat files to XML using the XML serialization method" - SK64 ( but the forums have stuff like this posted every day )
I don't mean to be offensive, but it seems like you only post "I hate XXX" any more, you're possibly taking flack just from people sick of nothing but whining. JSOP's rants are much more entertaining than yours. :rolleyes:
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies