Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Socialist America

Socialist America

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharphtmlcomai-codingtools
26 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mike Gaskey

    okay, you do understand. realize though that the supply, money aka wages, came from private industry.

    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Synaptrik
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Tis a vicious cycle. ;) The supply of goods is meaningless without wages with which to purchase. Supply side doesn't quite work as a theory due to the codependency upon wages.

    This statement is false

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      Synaptrik wrote:

      I was merely being facetious and can't consume serious replies

      Damn. I am such a sucker. Every time someone writes, 'I think," I take them at their word. :-O

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Synaptrik
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Oakman wrote:

      Every time someone writes, 'I think,"

      Ahhh... I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference.

      This statement is false

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Synaptrik

        Oakman wrote:

        Every time someone writes, 'I think,"

        Ahhh... I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference.

        This statement is false

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Synaptrik wrote:

        I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference

        I'll try to remember that you no longer think. Thanks for clearing that up.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Synaptrik wrote:

          I understand, slight reading comprehension error. I said "I thought" syntactical difference

          I'll try to remember that you no longer think. Thanks for clearing that up.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Synaptrik
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Whatever helps you sleep at night! :laugh: A small piece of advise that you are more than free to ignore. By adjusting your slant towards insult you might find a more intellectual discourse. It could be that you are stifling potential before it buds. Or rather you determine the playing field and game by your choice to insult. ... *awaiting the next laughable attempt at insult*

          This statement is false

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Synaptrik

            Whatever helps you sleep at night! :laugh: A small piece of advise that you are more than free to ignore. By adjusting your slant towards insult you might find a more intellectual discourse. It could be that you are stifling potential before it buds. Or rather you determine the playing field and game by your choice to insult. ... *awaiting the next laughable attempt at insult*

            This statement is false

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Synaptrik wrote:

            you might find a more intellectual discourse

            Lemme see. I spent 15 minutes writing a short, but fairly cogent explanation of why the medium of exchange is no longer a force for stability and you reply "duh, it's too long to read." And now you're advising me on how to have a conversation on a higher level? ROFL! The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you. Thank goodness for Diego's script. Plonk.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Synaptrik wrote:

              you might find a more intellectual discourse

              Lemme see. I spent 15 minutes writing a short, but fairly cogent explanation of why the medium of exchange is no longer a force for stability and you reply "duh, it's too long to read." And now you're advising me on how to have a conversation on a higher level? ROFL! The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you. Thank goodness for Diego's script. Plonk.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Synaptrik
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Oakman wrote:

              The most intellifent and satisfying conversation I can have with you, it seems, is to ignore you.

              And this is the best news I've heard of late. Thanks, I hope you have the temerity to follow through. But I seriously doubt your trollish tendencies will allow that.

              This statement is false

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups