Buy white....
-
Many of the born again christian churches here distribute lists of business owned by "good christians" and encourage their congregation to spend their money there as it "comes back to god" via tithing
Josh Gray wrote:
Many of the born again christian churches here distribute lists of business owned by "good christians" and encourage their congregation to spend their money there as it "comes back to god" via tithing
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
Many of the born again christian churches here distribute lists of business owned by "good christians" and encourage their congregation to spend their money there as it "comes back to god" via tithing
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
I never said it was bad. The point is that spending your money at businesses owned by a subset of the population with which you identify is the same if that subset is based on race or common belief or toe nail length.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
I never said it was bad. The point is that spending your money at businesses owned by a subset of the population with which you identify is the same if that subset is based on race or common belief or toe nail length.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
toe nail length
Is that real important is Oz? :omg:
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Oakman wrote:
Josh Gray wrote: toe nail length Is that real important is Oz?
Just an example but you know what they say about men with long toe nails...
Josh Gray wrote:
Just an example but you know what they say about men with long toe nails...
I thought that was women with long fingernails. . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Josh Gray wrote:
Just an example but you know what they say about men with long toe nails...
I thought that was women with long fingernails. . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
I never said it was bad. The point is that spending your money at businesses owned by a subset of the population with which you identify is the same if that subset is based on race or common belief or toe nail length.
Josh Gray wrote:
never said it was bad. The point is that spending your money at businesses owned by a subset of the population with which you identify is the same if that subset is based on race or common belief or toe nail length.
Hey, my only point is that making commercialism racial might not work out to the advantage of minorities. Still, I have always felt that most of this 'white privilege' mantra is really nothing more than the racism inherent to all ethnic groups trying to find a way to express itself against the ethnic group that was on top at the end of history, Phase I. The fact that we are tolerating this bullshit at all is proof that the right group won.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Oakman wrote:
I thought that was women with long fingernails. . .
As long as they can get a good grip...
-
Josh Gray wrote:
never said it was bad. The point is that spending your money at businesses owned by a subset of the population with which you identify is the same if that subset is based on race or common belief or toe nail length.
Hey, my only point is that making commercialism racial might not work out to the advantage of minorities. Still, I have always felt that most of this 'white privilege' mantra is really nothing more than the racism inherent to all ethnic groups trying to find a way to express itself against the ethnic group that was on top at the end of history, Phase I. The fact that we are tolerating this bullshit at all is proof that the right group won.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
tolerating this bullsh*t
Why is this bullshit while the example I gave of a similar thing along religious lines is a good idea?
Josh Gray wrote:
Why is this bullsh*t while the example I gave of a similar thing along religious lines is a good idea?
The buy black campaign is just stupid and ultimately counterproductive. The bullshit is the entire race industry mantra that we are all expected to kow tow to. Frankly, being white, I think white priviledge is an excellent idea. Hell, I wish someone would invent Scots-Irish priviledge. But than, I've never been very religious.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
Many of the born again christian churches here distribute lists of business owned by "good christians" and encourage their congregation to spend their money there as it "comes back to god" via tithing
I've never heard of that, but so what? Sounds perfectly ok. In fact, sounds like a good idea. I wish the united methodist had that kind of commitment.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
Why is this bullsh*t while the example I gave of a similar thing along religious lines is a good idea?
The buy black campaign is just stupid and ultimately counterproductive. The bullshit is the entire race industry mantra that we are all expected to kow tow to. Frankly, being white, I think white priviledge is an excellent idea. Hell, I wish someone would invent Scots-Irish priviledge. But than, I've never been very religious.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
The buy black campaign is just stupid and ultimately counterproductive. The bullsh*t is the entire race industry mantra that we are all expected to kow tow to. Frankly, being white, I think white priviledge is an excellent idea. Hell, I wish someone would invent Scots-Irish priviledge. But than, I've never been very religious.
But by differentiating between racial bias and other forms such as religious bias you are reinforcing the view that a racial difference is not the same as a religious difference or any other difference.
-
Hmmmm, thanks.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
As long as they can get a good grip...
both of them using both hands, you mean?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
The buy black campaign is just stupid and ultimately counterproductive. The bullsh*t is the entire race industry mantra that we are all expected to kow tow to. Frankly, being white, I think white priviledge is an excellent idea. Hell, I wish someone would invent Scots-Irish priviledge. But than, I've never been very religious.
But by differentiating between racial bias and other forms such as religious bias you are reinforcing the view that a racial difference is not the same as a religious difference or any other difference.
Josh Gray wrote:
you are reinforcing the view that a racial difference is not the same as a religious difference or any other difference.
yeah, so? Thats part of that whole race industry mantra I was just referring to.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
you are reinforcing the view that a racial difference is not the same as a religious difference or any other difference.
yeah, so? Thats part of that whole race industry mantra I was just referring to.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Thats part of that whole race industry mantra I was just referring to.
And the exact reason I would expect you to rise above it
By supporting it?
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.