does anyone know why
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
It's a California thing
In that case, I would have assumed that a bool would equate to "Gay" and "Straight". Marc
Hmm... I would think sexuality would be better represented by a
doublewhose value ranges between +1.0, exclusively heterosexual, and -1.0, exclusively homosexual (or vice versa).Software Zen:
delete this;
Fold With Us![^] -
As well as
iDon'tKnow?Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.
I believe the mnemonic is
iDunno, or possiblyiGuess.Software Zen:
delete this;
Fold With Us![^] -
Hmm... I would think sexuality would be better represented by a
doublewhose value ranges between +1.0, exclusively heterosexual, and -1.0, exclusively homosexual (or vice versa).Software Zen:
delete this;
Fold With Us![^]Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
Hmm... I would think sexuality would be better represented by a double whose value ranges between +1.0, exclusively heterosexual, and -1.0, exclusively homosexual (or vice versa).
Funny you mention that. I was talking with someone who says that psychologists believe that it's rare that people are on one extreme or the other. I guess the theory is that the majority of people fall between -1 and 0 or 0 and 1, and some cross over 0. I don't know. I think most of psychology is BS, but I guess like anything, it has its uses, up to a point. Marc
-
Are
iYesandiNosupported? When we are forced to use those values I think we will have a problem.lol :-D
Take a look at my corner of the net at Code Research Center