Once more unto the C++, dear friends, once more

[Single Step Debugger]

For some odd reason ^ replaced the _gc in the first CLI.

The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

[Rama Krishna Vavilala]

Deyan Georgiev wrote:

replaced the _gc

Which was even worse :).

[Nemanja Trifunovic]

Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

Which was even worse

I dissagree. Underscores are a standard-sanctioned way to extend the language. There was really no reason to break compatibility with Managed C++ and introduce "C++/CLI".

utf8-cpp

[Maximilien]

pelnor wrote:

Then I run into ^. Oh come on! Who thought ^ was a good idea?

It's a chinese pointer.

This signature was proudly tested on animals.

[John M Drescher]

Dan Neely wrote:

It's retarded.

Agreed. Although, in the 600K to 800K lines of C++ I have produced I do not recall ever using that one time. I would have had to look it up if I saw it..

John

[Single Step Debugger]

And if you put “&” before some variable, it will returns a strange combination of letters and numbers. I usually use this cute property for getting random numbers in runtime – works great!

The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

[Rama Krishna Vavilala]

Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:

Underscores are a standard-sanctioned way to extend the language

I agree with that. But there was no need for that (_gc keyword) in the first place. The whole thing could have been a lot simpler. The code simply looked ugly.

Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:

There was really no reason to break compatibility with Managed C++ and introduce "C++/CLI".

Managed C++ was ugly so was C++/CLI. So no arguments there.

[Dave Parker]

It's even better now. As well as pointers and references you now have handles. :) Not that I've ever worked with managed C++ or whatever its called now but I bet it's fun trying to get a handle on pointers to references of pointers to handles. Thing*&^thingy=&somethingNasty; (A while since I did C++ so the above is probably wrong.....)

[RugbyLeague]

I am converting a compiler and language runtime written in C++ into C# - that's fun :^)

[pelnor]

Propery configured was the challenge. I way jumping the old project over several versions of VS. Things did not go as smooth as i hoped for. But with google by my side i can't fail.

Latest toy built for fun: Web Lens Best feature: Full size images when using Google image search.

[pelnor]

Several years of VB got in the way. I mostly do c# now so it's not tooooo much culture shock. Just some head scratching.

Latest toy built for fun: Web Lens Best feature: Full size images when using Google image search.

[Dan Neely]

I know I've used it for something before, although I'm not sure what it was. Toggling a bitflag without knowing it's original value???

The latest nation. Procrastination.

[Nemanja Trifunovic]

Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:

ugly

I find all C-based languages to be ugly (some more than others). It is not about beauty, but usefulness. Managed C++ is useful for some scenarios and that's what matters. I'd rather use beautiful Haskell but it just does not let me get my job done.

utf8-cpp

[Peter Mulholland]

what about swapping 2 values without a temp variable:

char\* start = str;
char\* end = str + (strlen(str) - 1);

while (start < end) 
{
    \*start ^= \*end;
    \*end ^= \*start;
    \*start++ ^= \*end--;
}
return str;

Pete

[John M Drescher]

I remember that you can do this with XORs however for code readability I would never do that in a program.

John

[Nemanja Trifunovic]

John M. Drescher wrote:

you can do this with XORs however for code readability I would never do that in a program

Meh, pack it into a well named inline function, such as swap_in_place() and the readability problem is solved.

utf8-cpp

[John M Drescher]

I have lots of fun doing the reverse. :laugh:

John

[Single Step Debugger]

I’m not agreed. It was all over my code for almost three years. XOR is very heavily used in the cryptography.

The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

[John M Drescher]

Deyan Georgiev wrote:

XOR is very heavily used in the cryptography.

You just reminded me.. I actually may have to dig into this soon to interface with a medical workstation. I will probably just use a standard library however.

John

[Joe Woodbury]

pelnor wrote:

Then I run into ^. Oh come on! Who thought ^ was a good idea?

That's in C# too. And I've used it. (If you're going to harp on symbols, how about & meaning concatenate in VB? Or the difference between \ and /? Of course, just like in C++ and C#, once you know them, you know them.)