Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Do you want Agile and Uint Testing paradigm for Christmas? [modified]

Do you want Agile and Uint Testing paradigm for Christmas? [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
businesscsharpdelphitestingbeta-testing
8 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    ely_bob
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I may be way out of line here, however, I am not impressed with the person/persons who came up with the whole "agile/Unit" paradigm. I would say that this is the general way that i program, however my practices are not nearly as formalized. so I Ask do you agree? Formalized Unit testing, wastes more time then it saves, is best for collaborative projects, is best used where turnover is high, or is best used when working with someone who sucks at programming? Agile/Scrum, Use this when your not really sure where the project will be going, or with people who can't handle independently coding large blocks of working code, or Use this when your told to. The reason I ask is that i recently was offered a job upgrading a program from pascal to c# (told all "code" was operational), yet the were going to be adding Unit testing, and doing so under a Agile/Scrum environment... and were 8 months behind schedule. To me that screamed mismanagement, false advertising, or poor programmers. Was i wrong?:confused: _fixed Uint/Unit issue.... (I'm dislexic :suss: )

    I'd blame it on the Brain farts.. But lets be honest, it really is more like a Methane factory between my ears some days then it is anything else...

    modified on Friday, December 25, 2009 8:31 PM

    F M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • E ely_bob

      I may be way out of line here, however, I am not impressed with the person/persons who came up with the whole "agile/Unit" paradigm. I would say that this is the general way that i program, however my practices are not nearly as formalized. so I Ask do you agree? Formalized Unit testing, wastes more time then it saves, is best for collaborative projects, is best used where turnover is high, or is best used when working with someone who sucks at programming? Agile/Scrum, Use this when your not really sure where the project will be going, or with people who can't handle independently coding large blocks of working code, or Use this when your told to. The reason I ask is that i recently was offered a job upgrading a program from pascal to c# (told all "code" was operational), yet the were going to be adding Unit testing, and doing so under a Agile/Scrum environment... and were 8 months behind schedule. To me that screamed mismanagement, false advertising, or poor programmers. Was i wrong?:confused: _fixed Uint/Unit issue.... (I'm dislexic :suss: )

      I'd blame it on the Brain farts.. But lets be honest, it really is more like a Methane factory between my ears some days then it is anything else...

      modified on Friday, December 25, 2009 8:31 PM

      F Offline
      F Offline
      FyreWyrm
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      ely_bob wrote (multiple times):

      Uint

      What to unsigned integers have to do with agile development?

      Don't blame me. I voted for Chuck Norris.

      L P E 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • F FyreWyrm

        ely_bob wrote (multiple times):

        Uint

        What to unsigned integers have to do with agile development?

        Don't blame me. I voted for Chuck Norris.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        What to do unsigned integers have to do with agile development?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F FyreWyrm

          ely_bob wrote (multiple times):

          Uint

          What to unsigned integers have to do with agile development?

          Don't blame me. I voted for Chuck Norris.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          peterchen
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Well, you dynamically replace them with an int when you need to assign a negative value?

          Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
          | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

          H 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P peterchen

            Well, you dynamically replace them with an int when you need to assign a negative value?

            Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
            | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

            H Offline
            H Offline
            Hans Dietrich
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            peterchen wrote:

            Well, you dynamically replace them with an int when you need to assign a negative value?

            Yeah, but first you have to cast them. I think the OP is some kind of C++ purist.

            Best wishes, Hans


            [Hans Dietrich Software]

            E 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E ely_bob

              I may be way out of line here, however, I am not impressed with the person/persons who came up with the whole "agile/Unit" paradigm. I would say that this is the general way that i program, however my practices are not nearly as formalized. so I Ask do you agree? Formalized Unit testing, wastes more time then it saves, is best for collaborative projects, is best used where turnover is high, or is best used when working with someone who sucks at programming? Agile/Scrum, Use this when your not really sure where the project will be going, or with people who can't handle independently coding large blocks of working code, or Use this when your told to. The reason I ask is that i recently was offered a job upgrading a program from pascal to c# (told all "code" was operational), yet the were going to be adding Unit testing, and doing so under a Agile/Scrum environment... and were 8 months behind schedule. To me that screamed mismanagement, false advertising, or poor programmers. Was i wrong?:confused: _fixed Uint/Unit issue.... (I'm dislexic :suss: )

              I'd blame it on the Brain farts.. But lets be honest, it really is more like a Methane factory between my ears some days then it is anything else...

              modified on Friday, December 25, 2009 8:31 PM

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mike Diack
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I think you're absolutely right. I'm working on an agile project at the moment, and totally unconvinced of agiles "merits". I agree with "release early, release often" and "automate", but thats where I and the agile philosophy part company. I find it frustrating, slow and _MORE_ bureaucratic than the conventional / UML processes we were using before. Scrum for us is a waste of time, and Unit testing (currently at least) is doing nothing for us, because our application doesn't lend itself to unit testing readily. In short, maybe our managers are running it badly but I personally believe that agile is about 80% "Emperors New Clothes" based on what I've seen of it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F FyreWyrm

                ely_bob wrote (multiple times):

                Uint

                What to unsigned integers have to do with agile development?

                Don't blame me. I voted for Chuck Norris.

                E Offline
                E Offline
                ely_bob
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Sorry Dislexic... Uint should be Unit... :sigh: ... (fixed the origional question)

                I'd blame it on the Brain farts.. But lets be honest, it really is more like a Methane factory between my ears some days then it is anything else...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Hans Dietrich

                  peterchen wrote:

                  Well, you dynamically replace them with an int when you need to assign a negative value?

                  Yeah, but first you have to cast them. I think the OP is some kind of C++ purist.

                  Best wishes, Hans


                  [Hans Dietrich Software]

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  ely_bob
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  There is nothing "pure" about what I do. :laugh:

                  I'd blame it on the Brain farts.. But lets be honest, it really is more like a Methane factory between my ears some days then it is anything else...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups