Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. How to evaluate third party controls?

How to evaluate third party controls?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
designhelpjavajavascriptvisual-studio
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hiro_Protagonist_
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi guys, I need to evaluate some third party chart controls. What criteria are the most important? Just a list that I put together: - non technical - has a forum? - is it an active project? - good documentation? - company stability? - license model? - is source code available to be able to fix a bug when it is really necessary to do so? - technical - javascript vs java? (it is a web project, java based, where complete UI will reside in browser) - coloring? - data load (lazy load? paging?) - how can the data be passed? XML? via an API? - how the chart behaves on large sets of data? - Is the user interface Comfortable? I currently do not have the full list of features it must be capable of. What beside that you guys think is missing? cheers Holger

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Hiro_Protagonist_

      Hi guys, I need to evaluate some third party chart controls. What criteria are the most important? Just a list that I put together: - non technical - has a forum? - is it an active project? - good documentation? - company stability? - license model? - is source code available to be able to fix a bug when it is really necessary to do so? - technical - javascript vs java? (it is a web project, java based, where complete UI will reside in browser) - coloring? - data load (lazy load? paging?) - how can the data be passed? XML? via an API? - how the chart behaves on large sets of data? - Is the user interface Comfortable? I currently do not have the full list of features it must be capable of. What beside that you guys think is missing? cheers Holger

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Rule of thumb: Keep in house what is essential to your product, outsource what everyone else has.

      General

      Licence Foremost, the redistribution licence: are there per-client / per server cost? Second, number of developer seats. Future proofness Importance depends on the desired run time of your project. There are several ways: Sourece Code - the minimum I'd expect in most cases. In the worst case, you can fix and extend it on your own - but beware the cost. Drawback: it's tempting to modify / extend that, but changes need to be merged with the next update - which costs you. Community - That might mean Open Source, Forums etc. That helps only if there is a critical amount of users. With a few dozen or even hundred casual users, there's rarely a driving force to keep the forum alive, much less someone submitting code. If they do have forums, check for typical reply time, questions solved, and typical problems. Market - is there a decent-sized market for the product? If the owner folds, will someone pick up the product / provide a migration path? Companies that do have recurring costs (e.g. for support plan or updates) are actually preferrable - they at least thought about capturing maintenance cost. Still, if you are in for a niche product, source code might be the only safe bet. Support: A good community can give status quo support, only a thriving open-source project can provide technology upgrades. Consider paying extra for quick support. If you are trying to use a library, and you spend hours on trial and error, or wait a week for a reasonable reply, your schedule will start to lag. Technical - can't say much abotu that, the most important factor is: does it fit in? e.g. Java vs. JavaScript: can you afford an additional dependency, or do you use Java anyway? Handlign of large amounts of data - how much do you expect?

      Charts

      Do they have a trial? Customizing layout, axes etc.? Do the features work together well? (Yes, there is a charting component where the "dtaa cursor" demo suspicously has the zoom disabled. Guess why...) Frequent/realtime updates (if you need these)? When displaying multiple curves in one chart that may overlap: can the user bring them to the foreground e.g. by selecting them? Can you control the draw oder independent of the order in the legend? Interactivity - something easily underestimated. Can you zoom? Can you handle clicks, can you map click coordinates to chart coo

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        Rule of thumb: Keep in house what is essential to your product, outsource what everyone else has.

        General

        Licence Foremost, the redistribution licence: are there per-client / per server cost? Second, number of developer seats. Future proofness Importance depends on the desired run time of your project. There are several ways: Sourece Code - the minimum I'd expect in most cases. In the worst case, you can fix and extend it on your own - but beware the cost. Drawback: it's tempting to modify / extend that, but changes need to be merged with the next update - which costs you. Community - That might mean Open Source, Forums etc. That helps only if there is a critical amount of users. With a few dozen or even hundred casual users, there's rarely a driving force to keep the forum alive, much less someone submitting code. If they do have forums, check for typical reply time, questions solved, and typical problems. Market - is there a decent-sized market for the product? If the owner folds, will someone pick up the product / provide a migration path? Companies that do have recurring costs (e.g. for support plan or updates) are actually preferrable - they at least thought about capturing maintenance cost. Still, if you are in for a niche product, source code might be the only safe bet. Support: A good community can give status quo support, only a thriving open-source project can provide technology upgrades. Consider paying extra for quick support. If you are trying to use a library, and you spend hours on trial and error, or wait a week for a reasonable reply, your schedule will start to lag. Technical - can't say much abotu that, the most important factor is: does it fit in? e.g. Java vs. JavaScript: can you afford an additional dependency, or do you use Java anyway? Handlign of large amounts of data - how much do you expect?

        Charts

        Do they have a trial? Customizing layout, axes etc.? Do the features work together well? (Yes, there is a charting component where the "dtaa cursor" demo suspicously has the zoom disabled. Guess why...) Frequent/realtime updates (if you need these)? When displaying multiple curves in one chart that may overlap: can the user bring them to the foreground e.g. by selecting them? Can you control the draw oder independent of the order in the legend? Interactivity - something easily underestimated. Can you zoom? Can you handle clicks, can you map click coordinates to chart coo

        H Offline
        H Offline
        Hiro_Protagonist_
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Peter, thanks! :) that is comprehensive. Holger

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups