[Cricket] Sachin Tendulkar highest ODI
-
Take a bow for Sachin Tendulkar who has hit 195 and claimed the highest individual ODI total. And he is still going. I don't mind seeing such greatness even against my own team.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
Take a bow for Sachin Tendulkar who has hit 195 and claimed the highest individual ODI total. And he is still going. I don't mind seeing such greatness even against my own team.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
-
Take a bow for Sachin Tendulkar who has hit 195 and claimed the highest individual ODI total. And he is still going. I don't mind seeing such greatness even against my own team.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
200 n.o. at the end of the innings. I feel your pain, but take solace that the Safers were hit around the ground by one of the greatest to ever hold willow.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
Take a bow for Sachin Tendulkar who has hit 195 and claimed the highest individual ODI total. And he is still going. I don't mind seeing such greatness even against my own team.
cheers, Paul M. Watson.
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
-
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
#hem hem# This might have amready been mentioned...
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
200 n.o. at the end of the innings. I feel your pain, but take solace that the Safers were hit around the ground by one of the greatest to ever hold willow.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
200!
Wow, that's really a big big number... :rolleyes:If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
200!
Wow, that's really a big big number... :rolleyes:If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]:laugh:
Viral My Site
Save Our Tigers -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]Are you primed for some nyumerical punning?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
First time by a man. Awesome. Simply awesome. (Belinda Clarke made a double hundred more than a decade ago.)
Cheers, Vikram. (Got my troika of CCCs!)
Whta kills me is that Dhoni tried hard to stop Tendulkar from getting 200. If not for Dhoni Tendulkar would have had 200 at least 2 overs earlier.
-
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Are you primed for some nyumerical punning?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
Nope, that doesn't interest me. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Whta kills me is that Dhoni tried hard to stop Tendulkar from getting 200. If not for Dhoni Tendulkar would have had 200 at least 2 overs earlier.
I haven't seen any of the match - what was Dhoni doing exactly?
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
-
Nope, that doesn't interest me. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]You have to be rational here or there will be a real problem!
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
I haven't seen any of the match - what was Dhoni doing exactly?
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
Not giving Tendulkar the strike.
-
Not giving Tendulkar the strike.
Ohh, I shall have to catch the highlights. Fancy doing that when a 200 is in sights eh? Glad the little guy got it anyway. :)
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" ~ Albert Einstein "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." ~ Paul Neal "Red" Adair
-
You have to be rational here or there will be a real problem!
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
Yeah, my imaginary friend told me that irrational men often face complex problems. :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5.
Nah, 5 is odd.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]CPallini wrote:
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: I agree. Especially, when you look at it from the perspective of smaller numbers like 3, 4, or even 5. Nah, 5 is odd.
It certainly would be odd if it were even.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!