Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Installshield or Wise

Installshield or Wise

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
14 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D David Wulff

    The instller you talk about must be the Windows Installer, yes? In which case you'll still need a program to write the insatllation 'scripts' from you. Both InstallShield and Wise sell programs that work with Windows Installer. I have used both, and would recommened InstallShields's "InstallShield for Windows Installer" (ISWI) as it allows you to do just about anything you'd need to, and you can extend the standard actions with custom ones written in InstallScript - which is very powerful in it's own right. Wise for Windows Installer (WWI) is Wise's product, and again it allows you to do basically what you want with the Windows Installer service, but in my opinion it is not as good as IS's counterpart. ISWI also has the advantage of being made by InstallShield, and about 80% of the programs instlled over the last few years have started with the 'Please wait whilst InstallSheid starts the setup' message, which customers will instantly recognise, and feel 'at home' with. WWI, it can be argued, has the benefit of being made by Wise (really:)), and there a few comercial programs using it nowadays, but mostly shareware or free projects use it (from my expeience). Or, if you don't want ot use either, get the lastest Platform SDK documentation, which includes a huge section on the Windows Installer API, and write your own! If you are looking to get Windos 2000 certification you'll need to produce a setup that uses the Windows Installer service. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxe-software.co.uk P.S. I do not in any way work for InstallShield.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Your check's in the mail David <wink> InstallShield Marketing & Kickbacks Team

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Your check's in the mail David <wink> InstallShield Marketing & Kickbacks Team

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David Wulff
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      :) David Wulff dwulff@battleaxe-software.co.uk

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Wanderley M

        Could anyone advise me which is better? Or is there another good solution for an installation package? Regards, Wanderley

        C Offline
        C Offline
        ColinDavies
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Alternative
        InstallMaker
        Real easy to use , It's free, (as a legit unregistered user) It compresses files Handles ocx's' Builds Uninstaller Does the reg stuff, And it workz etc Regardz Colin Davies

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D David Wulff

          The instller you talk about must be the Windows Installer, yes? In which case you'll still need a program to write the insatllation 'scripts' from you. Both InstallShield and Wise sell programs that work with Windows Installer. I have used both, and would recommened InstallShields's "InstallShield for Windows Installer" (ISWI) as it allows you to do just about anything you'd need to, and you can extend the standard actions with custom ones written in InstallScript - which is very powerful in it's own right. Wise for Windows Installer (WWI) is Wise's product, and again it allows you to do basically what you want with the Windows Installer service, but in my opinion it is not as good as IS's counterpart. ISWI also has the advantage of being made by InstallShield, and about 80% of the programs instlled over the last few years have started with the 'Please wait whilst InstallSheid starts the setup' message, which customers will instantly recognise, and feel 'at home' with. WWI, it can be argued, has the benefit of being made by Wise (really:)), and there a few comercial programs using it nowadays, but mostly shareware or free projects use it (from my expeience). Or, if you don't want ot use either, get the lastest Platform SDK documentation, which includes a huge section on the Windows Installer API, and write your own! If you are looking to get Windos 2000 certification you'll need to produce a setup that uses the Windows Installer service. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxe-software.co.uk P.S. I do not in any way work for InstallShield.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Brad Bruce
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Why pay for a 3rd party setup program when Microsoft provides one for free:confused: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/downloads/vsi11/default.asp

          B D 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • W Wanderley M

            Could anyone advise me which is better? Or is there another good solution for an installation package? Regards, Wanderley

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Have tried many, and this one is my favorite: http://www.qsc.co.uk/gpi/gpinstall.htm

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Brad Bruce

              Why pay for a 3rd party setup program when Microsoft provides one for free:confused: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/downloads/vsi11/default.asp

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bill Gates 0
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              That's providing you want to use it of course :). It is very cludgy and not as easy to use as the others (I've only used Install for windows installer). Billy Boy

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Wanderley M

                Could anyone advise me which is better? Or is there another good solution for an installation package? Regards, Wanderley

                W Offline
                W Offline
                Wanderley M
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Thanks everybody for the tips - I'll try all of that. Regards, wmm

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Brad Bruce

                  Why pay for a 3rd party setup program when Microsoft provides one for free:confused: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/downloads/vsi11/default.asp

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Wulff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Oops :-0. I thought you were taling about the Windows Installer service itself, rather than the VSI. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxe-software.co.uk

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W Wanderley M

                    Could anyone advise me which is better? Or is there another good solution for an installation package? Regards, Wanderley

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Christian Graus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    We tried both and went with Setup Factory on the basis that it does everything we need ( check for IE5/DX6 and launch web link if not there, install, setup shortcuts, &tc ), is easier to use and costs 1/4 of the two you mention. Christian The content of this post is not necessarily the opinion of my yadda yadda yadda. To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C ColinDavies

                      Alternative
                      InstallMaker
                      Real easy to use , It's free, (as a legit unregistered user) It compresses files Handles ocx's' Builds Uninstaller Does the reg stuff, And it workz etc Regardz Colin Davies

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      I've been using InstallMaker for around a year or so, and have had absolutely no problems with it. I think it's kind of telling that I can knock out an installer with it in around 5 minutes, whereas my company spends a fortune debugging InstallShield scripts.... That said, the only thing missing is some basic scripting support, and the ability to launch other installers. Andy Metcalfe - Sonardyne International Ltd
                      (andy.metcalfe@lineone.net)
                      http://www.resorg.co.uk

                      "I used to be a medieval re-enactor, but I'm (nearly) alright now...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups