Is it me ?
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
C# is a product. and, products never get simpler - especially MS products.
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
-
Andrew Torrance wrote:
Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
When did C stop working?
Horses for courses . Back in the day we did everything in C . These damn new tools are much more productive , if not as fast executing . I doubt if I have the ability to either code or persuade my employers that we should code in C . Feel kind of sad though 'Born to code in C' was not just a book .
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
Andrew Torrance wrote:
purity of C
I've heard people call C powerful, concise, expressive, portable, successful... but this is the first time I hear anybody calling it pure :)
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
Expected ';'
'--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Free eBook: Printing - a .NET Developer's Guide (Part 1)
-
Andrew Torrance wrote:
purity of C
I've heard people call C powerful, concise, expressive, portable, successful... but this is the first time I hear anybody calling it pure :)
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
but this is the first time I hear anybody calling it pure
without adding "torture" :-)
'--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Free eBook: Printing - a .NET Developer's Guide (Part 1)
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
Andrew Torrance wrote:
syntactic purity of C.
You've never written a C parser have you? Or worse yet a C++ one. "purity" is NOT one of the words that comes to my mind.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
Or is language/syntax of C# getting more obtuse with each new release ? Its almost getting VBish ? Oh for the days of syntactic purity of C.
They are adding more features to it; sometimes even adding shorter syntax for certain things (e.g., automatic properties and lambdas). However, everything that worked in it before still works in it.
-
Andrew Torrance wrote:
syntactic purity of C.
You've never written a C parser have you? Or worse yet a C++ one. "purity" is NOT one of the words that comes to my mind.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
Holly cr*p, you just recalled a horrible memories in my head, I’ve did parsers with the both languages for embedded systems. At least it’s challenging and satisfying experience and makes you feel a real programmer.
The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.