Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. To Christian Grauss and Marc Clifton re air flights [modified]

To Christian Grauss and Marc Clifton re air flights [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
questionadobelounge
55 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    really?

    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

    L Offline
    L Offline
    LittleYellowBird
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Really .... move on! :)

    Ali

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L LittleYellowBird

      Really .... move on! :)

      Ali

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      'pot..kettle' is used to tell someone they are being hypocritical. Where have I been hypocritical?

      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        'pot..kettle' is used to tell someone they are being hypocritical. Where have I been hypocritical?

        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

        L Offline
        L Offline
        LittleYellowBird
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        What I meant was ..... You wrote: "Its funny how much the few hate this topic. They cannt ignore it" ..... but you can't ignore it either ..... Or put another way: The pot is calling the kettle black == you saying people can't ignore it, but you can't ignore it either .... that's all :)

        Ali

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L LittleYellowBird

          What I meant was ..... You wrote: "Its funny how much the few hate this topic. They cannt ignore it" ..... but you can't ignore it either ..... Or put another way: The pot is calling the kettle black == you saying people can't ignore it, but you can't ignore it either .... that's all :)

          Ali

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          Well, thats more a comment you should direct at my detractors since clearly THEY cant ignore it thought they feign disinterest in it. Of course I chose to 'not ignore' it since its a topic that I find relatively interesting. How that is hypocrisy I dont know.

          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N NormDroid

            Rage wrote:

            About as dramatically as the software development jobs available on the market.

            Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.

            Software Kinetics - Moving Software

            N Offline
            N Offline
            NMehta83
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Norm .net wrote:

            Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.

            Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item.... ;P

            NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N NMehta83

              Norm .net wrote:

              Don't worry the Indian bubble will burst soon.

              Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item.... ;P

              NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”

              N Offline
              N Offline
              NormDroid
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              NMehta83 wrote:

              Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item....

              I've heard some nonsense in my life, but this sir, takes the biscuit. :wtf: are you talking about.

              Software Kinetics - Moving Software

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N NormDroid

                NMehta83 wrote:

                Whenever your statement will become true for india then you would be next octopus for your country as you are from Germany and you will become sell-able item....

                I've heard some nonsense in my life, but this sir, takes the biscuit. :wtf: are you talking about.

                Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                N Offline
                N Offline
                NMehta83
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                my mistake...i saw the wrong profile and that is why i have written the above statement.

                NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N NMehta83

                  my mistake...i saw the wrong profile and that is why i have written the above statement.

                  NMehta83 “We cannot fail until we fail to try”

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  NormDroid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  :zzz:

                  Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Christian, when you state "then catching a plane that was going to fly anyhow, in order to meet to discuss ways to control it, would make perfect sense." you obviously arent aware that planes use more fuel when more heavilly loaded. It's to do with angle of attack. And as for your question about offsetting, are you serious? Are you really happy that your tax money is being spent this way? Its your country after all. Marc "As the 64 flights, the article says 93 people. So, the per person cost of about 6000 seats comes out to about $160. First class? That's a heck of a lot cheaper than what I pay for coach on most Southwest flights. Seems like a good expenditure, frankly. If people would only do the math, it would be pretty easy to see through the BS media hype." It doesnt state that all 93 staff went to all 64 seminars (not flights by the way) so your sums are invalid. The srticel does clearly state "The trips cost taxpayers more than $2.74 million in airfares and $1.6 million for accommodation and meals. The Government's special envoy on climate change, Howard Bamsey, was the biggest spender, racking up $229,000 in travel costs during 2009-10."

                    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                    moved on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:50 AM

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Marc Clifton
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    I love seeing my name in lights. Even gray ones. ;) Marc

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dalek Dave

                      You were having this conversation several hours ago when he was awake, and you failed to mention it then. Presumably because the thought hadn't occured to you. That is fine, but to have a riposte 6 hours later is not showing you at the top of your game.

                      ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Marc Clifton
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      Dalek Dave wrote:

                      Presumably because the thought hadn't occured to you.

                      fat_boy having a thought (i.e. thinking) is a big assumption on your part. ;) Marc

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Christian, when you state "then catching a plane that was going to fly anyhow, in order to meet to discuss ways to control it, would make perfect sense." you obviously arent aware that planes use more fuel when more heavilly loaded. It's to do with angle of attack. And as for your question about offsetting, are you serious? Are you really happy that your tax money is being spent this way? Its your country after all. Marc "As the 64 flights, the article says 93 people. So, the per person cost of about 6000 seats comes out to about $160. First class? That's a heck of a lot cheaper than what I pay for coach on most Southwest flights. Seems like a good expenditure, frankly. If people would only do the math, it would be pretty easy to see through the BS media hype." It doesnt state that all 93 staff went to all 64 seminars (not flights by the way) so your sums are invalid. The srticel does clearly state "The trips cost taxpayers more than $2.74 million in airfares and $1.6 million for accommodation and meals. The Government's special envoy on climate change, Howard Bamsey, was the biggest spender, racking up $229,000 in travel costs during 2009-10."

                        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                        moved on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 6:50 AM

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Maunder
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        Do I need to start asking politely again for you to respect my request to keep your GW diatribes out of the Lounge, or should I assume you don't really care and that simply deleting them will save us both a pointless conversation?

                        Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Maunder

                          Do I need to start asking politely again for you to respect my request to keep your GW diatribes out of the Lounge, or should I assume you don't really care and that simply deleting them will save us both a pointless conversation?

                          Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          Good point, just keep deleting them. See if you can keep up! :)

                          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Good point, just keep deleting them. See if you can keep up! :)

                            Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                            W Offline
                            W Offline
                            wolfbinary
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            You're behaving just like CSS if you do. Do as you're asked or leave. It's his site not yours.

                            That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W wolfbinary

                              You're behaving just like CSS if you do. Do as you're asked or leave. It's his site not yours.

                              That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              And what are you, his mouthpiece?

                              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                              F C W 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                And what are you, his mouthpiece?

                                Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fjdiewornncalwe
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                I know this is a new concept for you, but he's simply agreeing with the sentiment and expressing it.

                                I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                W 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  And what are you, his mouthpiece?

                                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  CaptainSeeSharp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  He is looking for a pat on the head and a treat from his dom.

                                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    And what are you, his mouthpiece?

                                    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    wolfbinary
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    No. :rolleyes: That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F fjdiewornncalwe

                                      I know this is a new concept for you, but he's simply agreeing with the sentiment and expressing it.

                                      I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      wolfbinary
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      I'm sure Chris has better things to do with his time then to boot the numskulls off his site all the time. That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups