Any open source wiki recommendations? [modified]
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.
-
I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
I'll second ScrewTurn Wiki[^]. I've not used it for anything large, but it's easy to set up and get going with. Asp.net with a SQL server back end. Free (GPL). Comes in two versions, one that uses IIS for server based environments, and one that uses a modified cassini host for desktop environments. Paid for alternative commercial redistribution licenses are available. Paid for hosting is also available.
Simon
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Yep, we're using MediaWiki at our office. It's been simple to setup, customise and maintain. :thumbsup:
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
I use wikipedia. Its very easy to administer but as a user I do not find it the easy to actually enter data. Sometimes I have to use html to get it do format the output like I want. To me this somewhat defeats the purpose of a wiki, since easy formatting and not having to write html I consider the biggest benifits over a simple web page. I guess I still have live edits though and do not need to fiddle with uploads and downloads and web site software.. Edit: I mean mediawiki the software that wikipedia runs under.. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki[^]
John
-
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
And it is currently getting high ratings for how well it stands up to outside attacks. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
-
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
-
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
Rob Graham wrote:
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
Not to mention torn condoms.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.
-
I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.
I use this as well for a couple of projects and like it. I've had a couple of issues in some formatting scenarios to float images, but I can say the same about a couple others as well. Articles on www.asp.net in the Ajax section also use screwturn.
-
Indeed. They just downvoted a few of my messages. I have just posted a question for the site moderators asking how I should handle this behavior in the future. If I just keep letting them downvote me, that's fine, as people tend to counter and it would only cause my reputation to increase more rapidly. And I don't mind letting them univote me so they have something to feel ashamed of later when they mature. But I reported it to the admins in case they want to take matters into their own hands.
-
There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.
modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM
MediaWiki, Wikipedia is based on it and look how popular it has become :laugh:
See if you can crack this: fb29a481781fe9b3fb8de57cda45fbef
The unofficial awesome history of Code Project's Bob! "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
-
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
Rob Graham wrote:
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
I don't believe that escorts have been mentioned in conjunction with his Swedish justice debacle. /J, from Sweden
Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel
-
Rob Graham wrote:
I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...
I don't believe that escorts have been mentioned in conjunction with his Swedish justice debacle. /J, from Sweden
Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel
-
I use wikipedia. Its very easy to administer but as a user I do not find it the easy to actually enter data. Sometimes I have to use html to get it do format the output like I want. To me this somewhat defeats the purpose of a wiki, since easy formatting and not having to write html I consider the biggest benifits over a simple web page. I guess I still have live edits though and do not need to fiddle with uploads and downloads and web site software.. Edit: I mean mediawiki the software that wikipedia runs under.. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki[^]
John
-
Tim Yen wrote:
Or is that Swedish injustice ?
That's up to the court to decide. Don't mix apple with pears - the fact that a man Has Done Great Things (wikileaks) doesn't mean he's above the law.
Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel
