Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Any open source wiki recommendations? [modified]

Any open source wiki recommendations? [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
phpquestionannouncement
19 Posts 14 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W wizardzz

    There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.

    modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM

    J Offline
    J Offline
    John M Drescher
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I use wikipedia. Its very easy to administer but as a user I do not find it the easy to actually enter data. Sometimes I have to use html to get it do format the output like I want. To me this somewhat defeats the purpose of a wiki, since easy formatting and not having to write html I consider the biggest benifits over a simple web page. I guess I still have live edits though and do not need to fiddle with uploads and downloads and web site software.. Edit: I mean mediawiki the software that wikipedia runs under.. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki[^]

    John

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nish Nishant

      Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:

      Regards, Nish


      My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Meech
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      And it is currently getting high ratings for how well it stands up to outside attacks. :)

      Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nish Nishant

        Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there! :rolleyes:

        Regards, Nish


        My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rob Graham
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

        Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!

        I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

        N J 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R Rob Graham

          Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

          Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!

          I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nish Nishant
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Rob Graham wrote:

          I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

          Not to mention torn condoms.

          Regards, Nish


          My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A AspDotNetDev

            I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.

            [Forum Guidelines]

            B Offline
            B Offline
            badprog
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Wow...you pissed someone off...

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A AspDotNetDev

              I've been using ScrewTurn Wiki for about a year. I love it.

              [Forum Guidelines]

              T Offline
              T Offline
              TheyCallMeMrJames
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I use this as well for a couple of projects and like it. I've had a couple of issues in some formatting scenarios to float images, but I can say the same about a couple others as well. Articles on www.asp.net in the Ajax section also use screwturn.

              They Call me Mister James

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B badprog

                Wow...you pissed someone off...

                A Offline
                A Offline
                AspDotNetDev
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Indeed. They just downvoted a few of my messages. I have just posted a question for the site moderators asking how I should handle this behavior in the future. If I just keep letting them downvote me, that's fine, as people tend to counter and it would only cause my reputation to increase more rapidly. And I don't mind letting them univote me so they have something to feel ashamed of later when they mature. But I reported it to the admins in case they want to take matters into their own hands.

                [Forum Guidelines]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W wizardzz

                  There seems to be an endless amount of options out there. Does anyone have positive first hand experience with any? It will be used for internal documentation / knowledge-base that all developers can update internally. Preferences of the higher ups are asp and free, but I'd be open to php. [Update] We are going to go with ScrewTurn for the time being. Thanks for all the advice.

                  modified on Monday, December 6, 2010 4:04 PM

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  LloydA111
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  MediaWiki, Wikipedia is based on it and look how popular it has become :laugh:


                  See if you can crack this: fb29a481781fe9b3fb8de57cda45fbef

                  The unofficial awesome history of Code Project's Bob! "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rob Graham

                    Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

                    Julian Assange prefers MediaWiki. I reckon that is a good reference right there!

                    I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Johann Gerell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Rob Graham wrote:

                    I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

                    I don't believe that escorts have been mentioned in conjunction with his Swedish justice debacle. /J, from Sweden

                    Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Johann Gerell

                      Rob Graham wrote:

                      I hear he's also a good reference for Swedish escort services...

                      I don't believe that escorts have been mentioned in conjunction with his Swedish justice debacle. /J, from Sweden

                      Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tim Yen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Or is that Swedish injustice ?

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J John M Drescher

                        I use wikipedia. Its very easy to administer but as a user I do not find it the easy to actually enter data. Sometimes I have to use html to get it do format the output like I want. To me this somewhat defeats the purpose of a wiki, since easy formatting and not having to write html I consider the biggest benifits over a simple web page. I guess I still have live edits though and do not need to fiddle with uploads and downloads and web site software.. Edit: I mean mediawiki the software that wikipedia runs under.. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki[^]

                        John

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Tim Yen
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        I second the comment entering data into MediaWiki is hard. For tech savvy people it is barely OK, the non tech people at work hate it with a passion. But then maybe we are using an old version. It has no real WYSIWIG

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Tim Yen

                          Or is that Swedish injustice ?

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Johann Gerell
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Tim Yen wrote:

                          Or is that Swedish injustice ?

                          That's up to the court to decide. Don't mix apple with pears - the fact that a man Has Done Great Things (wikileaks) doesn't mean he's above the law.

                          Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups