Better news from Red Gate
-
http://www.reflector.net/2011/04/why-we-reversed-some-of-our-reflector-decision[^] Personally, I think this is the right decision (and the way they should have played it in the first place).
"We also figured that, after the initial emotional decision, people’s logic would kick in, they’d calm down, and they’d realise that asking people to pay less than the cost of a decent meal for a tool that they love isn’t, actually, terribly evil after all." If he thinks you need to pay more than $35 for a decent meal, I'm not sure if he's either a food snob or living somewhere very expensive. I might spend that much once or twice a year as a splurge item, but it's far outside my norm; and only makes their reality disconnect even more visible.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
I think that the decision to have a paid-for version was justified. Given that I think that the decision to allow current versions to expire was misjudged. It would have been much better had they decided to do what they are now doing right from the start. The indecisiveness, and increased free competition makes it easier for the conspiracy theorists to point the finger. Bad PR all round from RedGate.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
Henry Minute wrote:
Given that I think that the decision to allow current versions to expire was misjudged.
As I understand, expiration was implemented by Lutz Roeder himself, long before RedGate bought it. For me, this is a clear sign saying "It's free now, but not yours." I certainly understand that (a) losing a valuable tool hurts, and (b) $35 can be a lot for some people. However, the level of outrage against Red Gate was simply... uncivilized. I don't know a better word.
FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy -
Henry Minute wrote:
Given that I think that the decision to allow current versions to expire was misjudged.
As I understand, expiration was implemented by Lutz Roeder himself, long before RedGate bought it. For me, this is a clear sign saying "It's free now, but not yours." I certainly understand that (a) losing a valuable tool hurts, and (b) $35 can be a lot for some people. However, the level of outrage against Red Gate was simply... uncivilized. I don't know a better word.
FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchypeterchen wrote:
As I understand, expiration was implemented by Lutz Roeder himself
Agreed.
peterchen wrote:
outrage against Red Gate was simply... uncivilized
Agreed. However RedGate had the code, they could (and should) have removed the expiry code.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.