Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Study proves what we've always known .. IE6 users are dumb.

Study proves what we've always known .. IE6 users are dumb.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comdata-structuresquestion
23 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    that I want to write a lengthy diatribe detailing its flaws that nobody will read or care about fortunately, today, tired wins. ...but it's a little weird to declare something as "statistically significant" and then conspicuously fail to disclose the size of the groups being tested or the statistical tests used ...and really? bar graphs without error bars? ...really? "faired a little better?" In a study about intelligence? why are you trying to hurt me

    - F

    D Offline
    D Offline
    David1987
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Well, for all its faults, the paper also mentions not being very scientific..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D David1987

      Source (warning: pdf)[^] (google viewer link[^]) The average IQ of IE6 users in 2011 was just a bit over 80, whereas Firefox is around 110 and Opera around 130. In case you're not familiar with the IQ scale, it's a bell graph scale where 100 is by definition the average, and the standard deviation is 15. 80 is officially[^] bad (dullness, or somewhere between mild mental retardation and dull-normal). So, are you still using IE6? :)

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Well, I believe that the relationship between IQ and the browser is the other way round. It's not that IE users are dumb, but rather users with better IQ choose better browsers.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        that I want to write a lengthy diatribe detailing its flaws that nobody will read or care about fortunately, today, tired wins. ...but it's a little weird to declare something as "statistically significant" and then conspicuously fail to disclose the size of the groups being tested or the statistical tests used ...and really? bar graphs without error bars? ...really? "faired a little better?" In a study about intelligence? why are you trying to hurt me

        - F

        S Offline
        S Offline
        soap brain
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Off topic question: have you or will you be trained to perform abortions? Is it a medical procedure that's routinely taught?

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S soap brain

          Off topic question: have you or will you be trained to perform abortions? Is it a medical procedure that's routinely taught?

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          So the reasoning behind why abortion is legal and supported by the medical community is pretty thoroughly discussed in medical school, but typically only obstetrician/gynecologists are taught the actual drugs and procedures during their residency after medical school is over. Since I went into a medicine residency rather than ob/gyne, I'll never be taught how to or be licensed to manage medical/surgical abortions. Medical abortions are fairly easy to learn drug regimes and are usually easy to manage (if you can catch the pregnancy early enough to be eligible); and there are, apparently, several 'stages' of training that they use to prepare ob/gyne residents to be able to perform surgical abortions, which include frequent counseling, observation of the procedure, etc. Surgical abortions for fetuses >= about 20 weeks require special training as they are fairly risky procedures reserved almost exclusively for fetuses with genetic abnormalities incompatible with life. If I recall, there's only one gyne in Canada that will do abortions between 20-22 weeks, and there are less than a handful in the U.S. that will openly do 22-24. Abortions are one of those things where it's basically lousy that they exist, lousy for the people who have to have them, lousy for the people who have to do them, but society would be lousier and women would be worse off without access to them.

          - F

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David1987

            Source (warning: pdf)[^] (google viewer link[^]) The average IQ of IE6 users in 2011 was just a bit over 80, whereas Firefox is around 110 and Opera around 130. In case you're not familiar with the IQ scale, it's a bell graph scale where 100 is by definition the average, and the standard deviation is 15. 80 is officially[^] bad (dullness, or somewhere between mild mental retardation and dull-normal). So, are you still using IE6? :)

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Actually the study proves what we have always known: That some people are so eager to have their preconceptions verified that they'll believe any shit that is thrown against the wall and sticks. The site was bogus. The study was bogus Anyone who claimed that the study proved what they always knew is too easily fooled.

            The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.

            D L 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Actually the study proves what we have always known: That some people are so eager to have their preconceptions verified that they'll believe any shit that is thrown against the wall and sticks. The site was bogus. The study was bogus Anyone who claimed that the study proved what they always knew is too easily fooled.

              The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              David1987
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              It was in the official news. I do not have to verify the official news.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Actually the study proves what we have always known: That some people are so eager to have their preconceptions verified that they'll believe any shit that is thrown against the wall and sticks. The site was bogus. The study was bogus Anyone who claimed that the study proved what they always knew is too easily fooled.

                The 3-legged stool of understanding is held up by history, languages, and mathematics. Equipped with these three you can learn anything you want to learn. But if you lack any one of them you are just another ignorant peasant with dung on your boots. R. A. H.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                Bahahahah! Love it. The real tragedy here is that as presented it's not sufficiently bad enough to truly distinguish it as a fake when compared to other gems of "sciencey" you find on the web.

                - F

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David1987

                  Source (warning: pdf)[^] (google viewer link[^]) The average IQ of IE6 users in 2011 was just a bit over 80, whereas Firefox is around 110 and Opera around 130. In case you're not familiar with the IQ scale, it's a bell graph scale where 100 is by definition the average, and the standard deviation is 15. 80 is officially[^] bad (dullness, or somewhere between mild mental retardation and dull-normal). So, are you still using IE6? :)

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Alan Burkhart
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  David1987 wrote:

                  In case you're not familiar with the IQ scale, it's a bell graph scale where 100 is by definition the average, and the standard deviation is 15. 80 is officially[^] bad (dullness, or somewhere between mild mental retardation and dull-normal).

                  So now that the story has been proven a hoax, how smart do YOU feel? :laugh:

                  XAlan Burkhart

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Alan Burkhart

                    David1987 wrote:

                    In case you're not familiar with the IQ scale, it's a bell graph scale where 100 is by definition the average, and the standard deviation is 15. 80 is officially[^] bad (dullness, or somewhere between mild mental retardation and dull-normal).

                    So now that the story has been proven a hoax, how smart do YOU feel? :laugh:

                    XAlan Burkhart

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David1987
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Oh I don't know, about as smart as every major news outlet and most tech blogs, all of which ran this as real news?

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D David1987

                      Oh I don't know, about as smart as every major news outlet and most tech blogs, all of which ran this as real news?

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Alan Burkhart
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      David1987 wrote:

                      Oh I don't know, about as smart as every major news outlet and most tech blogs, all of which ran this as real news?

                      OK, good answer. :thumbsup:

                      XAlan Burkhart

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups