Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Contest - Google Whacking [modified]

Contest - Google Whacking [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
databaselearning
34 Posts 16 Posters 37 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Suresh Suthar

    "Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)

    The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOPR Offline
    realJSOP
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Until tomorrow. Then, there will be two.

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      You sir have just whacked Google. :thumbsup:

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Suresh Suthar
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      Ᵽompey wrote:

      You sir have just whacked Google

      Delighted..... :)

      The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

        modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

        S Offline
        S Offline
        S Houghtelin
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        "Maunder Pompey" 1 result (0.08 seconds) Like that?

        It was broke, so I fixed it.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

          modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Suresh Suthar
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          "antidisestablishmentarianism hates" 1 result (0.13 seconds)

          The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S S Houghtelin

            "Maunder Pompey" 1 result (0.08 seconds) Like that?

            It was broke, so I fixed it.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            I do like it, but if you go to the actual web-page it is just a jumble of random words, which disqualifies it from the contest.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

              modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Suresh Suthar
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              "antidisestablishmentarian man" 1 result (0.13 seconds)

              The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Suresh Suthar

                "Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)

                The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriff
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Now you have to visit the site owners in person and get them to find two more... Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure[^] [edit]Damn those "encode HTML tags" buttons...[/edit]

                Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."

                "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                  modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  JavedFeroze
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  "hamster pogrom" got one in 0.07 sec

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                    Now you have to visit the site owners in person and get them to find two more... Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure[^] [edit]Damn those "encode HTML tags" buttons...[/edit]

                    Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Suresh Suthar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    I didn't get you. BTW I searched for longest word and accidentally added zest to it, and I got this.....

                    The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

                    OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                      modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dalek Dave
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      "rubi dious" "imm ortal" Gives this[^] I have split the words with spaces so that this page does not add to the entries and it maintains it's singularity.

                      ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                        modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Pete OHanlon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        Try "beacon datagrid" (with quotes).

                        Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                        My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                          modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Anthony Mushrow
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          How about "Beryllium Progressed", 1 result.

                          -SK Genius

                          Vehicle Simulation Demo - New and Improved!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                            modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            S Houghtelin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            "Caledon Bacon" 1 result (0.12 seconds)

                            It was broke, so I fixed it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Suresh Suthar

                              I didn't get you. BTW I searched for longest word and accidentally added zest to it, and I got this.....

                              The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

                              OriginalGriffO Offline
                              OriginalGriffO Offline
                              OriginalGriff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Follow the link: a man called Dave Gorman found a couple of GoogleWacks, and went to meet the site owners in a chain... Funny book, based on reality.

                              Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."

                              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                              "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                                modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LucianPopescu
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                submit them here : http://googlewhack.com/[^]

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Suresh Suthar

                                  "Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)

                                  The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  I get 4160 results (0.15 seconds)

                                  If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                                  You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                                    modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    wizardzz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    When you get caught google whacking, this is not the first thing I will think of.

                                    "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson My comedy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                                      modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      sucram
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      "cacophony stipulated"

                                      Ego non sum semper iustus tamen Ego sum nunquam nefas!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'

                                        modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        AspDotNetDev
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        "I_n_s_c_r_u_t_a_b_l_e D_a_l_e_k" (underscores added to preserve singularity)

                                        Martin Fowler wrote:

                                        Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                                          I get 4160 results (0.15 seconds)

                                          If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
                                          You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          You need to put the " " around it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups