WPF Performance
-
"WPF Performance" vote +1 for oxymoron of the month. Joking aside, yes it does have some performance issues in parts. If you want speed try using Direct2D, if you want databinding and a comprehensive UI library use WPF. If you want to use a light C# wrapper around the old Win32 stuff, use Winforms. Maybe next months Build conference will offer up a new choice.
-
"WPF Performance" vote +1 for oxymoron of the month. Joking aside, yes it does have some performance issues in parts. If you want speed try using Direct2D, if you want databinding and a comprehensive UI library use WPF. If you want to use a light C# wrapper around the old Win32 stuff, use Winforms. Maybe next months Build conference will offer up a new choice.
If they do, they should just short-cut the bulk of the process by calling it AbandonWare.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 -
If they do, they should just short-cut the bulk of the process by calling it AbandonWare.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997If they do, I suggest we load up and lay waste to the bastards :suss:. I'm a lousy shot, but maybe I can distract the cannon fodder while you take out the officers.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
"WPF Performance" vote +1 for oxymoron of the month. Joking aside, yes it does have some performance issues in parts. If you want speed try using Direct2D, if you want databinding and a comprehensive UI library use WPF. If you want to use a light C# wrapper around the old Win32 stuff, use Winforms. Maybe next months Build conference will offer up a new choice.
John Stewien wrote:
new choice
Yeah, it's called HTML5 and JavaScript. ;P ;P :laugh: :rolleyes: :-O :omg: :wtf: :mad::confused::~ X| :^)
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
"WPF Performance" vote +1 for oxymoron of the month. Joking aside, yes it does have some performance issues in parts. If you want speed try using Direct2D, if you want databinding and a comprehensive UI library use WPF. If you want to use a light C# wrapper around the old Win32 stuff, use Winforms. Maybe next months Build conference will offer up a new choice.
-
John Stewien wrote:
new choice
Yeah, it's called HTML5 and JavaScript. ;P ;P :laugh: :rolleyes: :-O :omg: :wtf: :mad::confused::~ X| :^)
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von BraunWell there's also Win8ML (whatever the XAML team creates when they were shifted from the VS Division to the Windows Division).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius
