Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Anyone using Webp?

Anyone using Webp?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
24 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Pete OHanlon

    Ah, yet another Google-only "web standard". When Microsoft attempt this, they get slammed; when Google do this, people laud them. Oh, it must stink to be a Softie.

    Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

    "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

    My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

    E Offline
    E Offline
    ed welch
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    A lot of standards start off with one company introducing it and, if it's a good idea, everyone else adopting it (that's how ajax came about). You can be waiting for a long time for a standands commitee to approve something

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H hairy_hats

      ed welch wrote:

      (unfortunately, not alpha transparancy just yet)

      "WebP supports losseless transparency (also known as alpha channel)"[^]

      E Offline
      E Offline
      ed welch
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Not implemented yet. But in future versions of chome (hopefully)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Pete OHanlon

        Hardly. I prefer Chrome to IE, and Google search to Bing. I just can't stomach the "holier than thou" attitude.

        Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

        "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

        My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nagy Vilmos
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

        I just can't stomach the "holier than thou" attitude.

        You missed the opportunity to add a '--- posted from my iPad ---' sig. :-D


        Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E ed welch

          Just wondering if anyone has tried out this format. It's only supported by Chrome of coarse, but it compresses better than jpeg and supports transparency (unfortunately, not alpha transparancy just yet)

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Only when it was new. Does their encoder still suck? JPG is ancient and outdated, and WebP is theoretically better (though not state of the art), but libvpx (used to?) optimize for PSNR which is an almost useless quality metric (it loves blur - humans don't).

          E E 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Only when it was new. Does their encoder still suck? JPG is ancient and outdated, and WebP is theoretically better (though not state of the art), but libvpx (used to?) optimize for PSNR which is an almost useless quality metric (it loves blur - humans don't).

            E Offline
            E Offline
            ed welch
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            The image quality looks fine to me

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E ed welch

              The image quality looks fine to me

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Just "it'll do" or better than JPG at the same filesize?

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nagy Vilmos

                Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                I just can't stomach the "holier than thou" attitude.

                You missed the opportunity to add a '--- posted from my iPad ---' sig. :-D


                Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                *Hack spit* Posted from my Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tablet.

                Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                N L F 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Just "it'll do" or better than JPG at the same filesize?

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  ed welch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  It seems to compress better than jpeg, but that's not why I would use it. jpeg doesn't have transparency. That is the whole point of using it from my point of view

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E ed welch

                    It seems to compress better than jpeg, but that's not why I would use it. jpeg doesn't have transparency. That is the whole point of using it from my point of view

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    You might as well use PNG then, right? It'll be bigger, but every browser supports it (except ancient IE's of course)

                    E 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Pete OHanlon

                      *Hack spit* Posted from my Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tablet.

                      Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                      "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nagy Vilmos
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      :-D


                      Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        You might as well use PNG then, right? It'll be bigger, but every browser supports it (except ancient IE's of course)

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        ed welch
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        PNG is 5 times bigger. Totatally unaccepatable if you have big images.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E ed welch

                          PNG is 5 times bigger. Totatally unaccepatable if you have big images.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          So you have jpg: no transparency. png: too big. webp: not supported. So.. GIF? :laugh:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Pete OHanlon

                            *Hack spit* Posted from my Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tablet.

                            Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                            "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                            My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Luc Pattyn
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Isn't that related to the Nexus-that-may-go-all-silent-anytime? :)

                            Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Pete OHanlon

                              Hardly. I prefer Chrome to IE, and Google search to Bing. I just can't stomach the "holier than thou" attitude.

                              Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                              "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                              My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Luc Pattyn
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              I knew that. And you knew I did. And I knew you'd say that anyway. It is the product that matters, much more so than the manufacturer. :)

                              Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Pete OHanlon

                                *Hack spit* Posted from my Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tablet.

                                Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                                "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                                My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                Fabio Franco
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                *Hack spit* [2]

                                "To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E ed welch

                                  Just wondering if anyone has tried out this format. It's only supported by Chrome of coarse, but it compresses better than jpeg and supports transparency (unfortunately, not alpha transparancy just yet)

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Chrisgo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Did you use "coarse" because it rubs you the wrong way?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Only when it was new. Does their encoder still suck? JPG is ancient and outdated, and WebP is theoretically better (though not state of the art), but libvpx (used to?) optimize for PSNR which is an almost useless quality metric (it loves blur - humans don't).

                                    E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    Erling Limm
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    How about JPEG XR? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR[^] I'm curious to how it compares to WebP with compression and quality...

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E ed welch

                                      A lot of standards start off with one company introducing it and, if it's a good idea, everyone else adopting it (that's how ajax came about). You can be waiting for a long time for a standands commitee to approve something

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      DerekT P
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      There is no Ajax standard, because there is no Ajax product. Ajax is a concept, (one which I was using in earnest about two years before anyone coined the "AJAX" acronym). Unfortunately there are several competing frameworks that implement Ajax concepts in different ways, and the sad fact is that too often developers forget what it is that they're actually doing. In most Ajax situations it is FAR more efficient to write 5 lines of cross-browser code and implement a "custom" solution than to waste resources downloading and executing overly complex frameworks. Rant over. Derek TP

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • E Erling Limm

                                        How about JPEG XR? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR[^] I'm curious to how it compares to WebP with compression and quality...

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        I don't know, never used it. It would depend on the encoder anyway.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups