No wonder Windows Phone market share sucks
-
A quick search of the Verizon site shows only one phone (HTC Trophy) for WP7. Not sure if it's MS, the handset manufacturers or Verizon. But that is truly sad.
Probably VZW. After the MS Kin fiasco Big Red's had a major hateon for all phones Redmond.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
With just over a month to go before I get a phone upgrade discount from Verizon, and thinking it's maybe time to try out a smartphone, I stop by the local Verizon store yesterday. Ask to see a Windows phone [wife has an iPhone and can't say I'm impressed]. 1st Verizon rep: "Windows phone?" and off he goes to find somebody more knowledgeable. 2nd Verizon rep: "Not sure we even have one on display." However, he does find one, then spends the next 15 minutes telling me I don't want a Windows phone and trying to sell me on Android. He finally admits he doesn't really know anything about WP7 and leaves me alone. To my frustration, the demo WinPhone was stuck in an endless loop of "updating demo material, resetting, restarting, rinse, repeat," and I was never able to actually try it. Don't know how you can expect to sell a phone in any quantity when the carrier's rep argues against the product. Seems MS ought to be throwing some marketing muscle at the carriers, or big subsidies on the hardware to get the phones into peoples' hands.
I agree that they need to be doing something to get the carriers to push the platform. It's a great OS, but unless you get the chance to see it in action, you won't know that.
-
In my opinion, WP7 is mostly a geeks and developers phone right now. I don't know of any normal people who use those phones. So it's not surprising that the sales guy tried to sell you an iPhone/Android.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Well, one of my sons, my daughter, her husband, and my sister-in-law all have Windows phones. But they're all connected to me (not literally, of course), so perhaps they don't count. :-D
-
Worse than that is the developer program. You have to pay them $99 per year to "unlock" your phone in order to test your apps on it (vs. using the emulator). To me the message is "we don't care about developers".
QRZ? de WAØTTN
But you can get the development environment for free and it runs on a computer you probably already own.
-
Well, one of my sons, my daughter, her husband, and my sister-in-law all have Windows phones. But they're all connected to me (not literally, of course), so perhaps they don't count. :-D
Marc A. Brown wrote:
so perhaps they don't count. :-D
No, they don't. They are nerdy by biological association or through marriage. :-D
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
I agree that they need to be doing something to get the carriers to push the platform. It's a great OS, but unless you get the chance to see it in action, you won't know that.
Marc A. Brown wrote:
they need to be doing something
Interestingly, just this morning I read that MS will be paying Nokia $240US/phone, thereby enabling the carriers to offer phones with higher-end hardware specs at bargain basement prices. The article suggested that the Lumia 900 will debut at AT&T for $99. No word on when a Verizon version of the NOK phone(s) would appear. While price is a key component of the equation, there is no buzz among consumers and certainly no push from the Verizon reps I encountered. Without some consumer buzz or some carrier push, or both, I fear the brand will languish. I already got caught in the Zune player discontinuation fiasco when that offering languished - don't want a repeat on the phone front
-
Marc A. Brown wrote:
so perhaps they don't count. :-D
No, they don't. They are nerdy by biological association or through marriage. :-D
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
All through marriage, technically (the kids are stepchildren). Poor people, absorbing my geekiness through association. But they're all very happy with their phones, so I guess it's not all bad. :-D
-
All through marriage, technically (the kids are stepchildren). Poor people, absorbing my geekiness through association. But they're all very happy with their phones, so I guess it's not all bad. :-D
Marc A. Brown wrote:
But they're all very happy with their phones, so I guess it's not all bad. :-D
Goes without saying - Metro for the win! :cool:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Marc A. Brown wrote:
they need to be doing something
Interestingly, just this morning I read that MS will be paying Nokia $240US/phone, thereby enabling the carriers to offer phones with higher-end hardware specs at bargain basement prices. The article suggested that the Lumia 900 will debut at AT&T for $99. No word on when a Verizon version of the NOK phone(s) would appear. While price is a key component of the equation, there is no buzz among consumers and certainly no push from the Verizon reps I encountered. Without some consumer buzz or some carrier push, or both, I fear the brand will languish. I already got caught in the Zune player discontinuation fiasco when that offering languished - don't want a repeat on the phone front
Duke Carey wrote:
I already got caught in the Zune player discontinuation fiasco
I thoroughly love my Zune HD, though I'm not using it at this time. Its interface is part of the reason I was so excited about WP7 when it was announced. I'm not using it these days because I've started using Zune on my phone. The only problem there is that I don't have enough storage on the phone for all of my music, so I have to compromise there.
Duke Carey wrote:
don't want a repeat on the phone front
Amen to that. I think Microsoft, along with the device manufacturers, need to be doing something with the carriers to get their salespeople to actually sell these devices instead of ignoring or disparaging them. Maybe we'll start to see that with Nokia.
-
Marc A. Brown wrote:
But they're all very happy with their phones, so I guess it's not all bad. :-D
Goes without saying - Metro for the win! :cool:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nish Sivakumar wrote:
Metro for the win!
Indeed. I'd recommend you shout that from the front page of the lounge all day long, but it might get us into trouble.