This is just silly and seems hypocritical
-
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
Put yourself in a room full of fanbois. Now do you decide to support the Apple ideal or maintain an aloof superiority to the poor deluded fools? If it was the other way round, a fanboi surrounded by MS fans, he'd still try to convince us that his view is the right view. That my friend is evangelising.
There is a universe of difference between a tangible object and a fantasy object!
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
As for religions that discourage it, I'd be surprised
Judaism for one: we neither seek nor accept converts (the last isn't true any more but there is a great deal of rigor applied to someone that does choose to convert). You really have to be born Jewish and it comes through the mother, not the father. If you have a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother then you ain't Jewish.
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
I won't try to convert you, but I will pray for you.
Please don't waste your time on my account.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
mark merrens wrote:
If you have a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother then you ain't Jewish.
That would have been a great consolation to my (half) great aunts had Germany invaded the UK. :)
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
-
Is all satire hypocritical then? Are people that are being sarcastic lying?
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
This wasn't satire. It was mocking.
wizardzz wrote:
Are people that are being sarcastic lying?
Sometimes, absolutely. Satire often uses gross misrepresentations in a bumbling attempt to make a point. Such intentional misrepresentations are certainly lying.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
I have a kindly face: I'm always the one that gets stopped: people think I'm interested because I smile and look them in the eye. Well, fock em, from now on it's the grinch! Actually, I think one was a scientologist: scum of the earth.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
mark merrens wrote:
I'm always the one that gets stopped
Same here. I used to be polite, but now I am not - much to my wife's embarrassment. I can also recommend the "This is a Catholic family" ploy. It is amazingly effective with door-steppers.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
-
This wasn't satire. It was mocking.
wizardzz wrote:
Are people that are being sarcastic lying?
Sometimes, absolutely. Satire often uses gross misrepresentations in a bumbling attempt to make a point. Such intentional misrepresentations are certainly lying.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von BraunI don't view it as mockery. It may not be good natured satire, but it is making a joke out of what the religious groups had done by essentially doing the exact same thing as them, only without any god based religious meaning. It shouldn't bother the religious groups, since there is no god given power given to the aethiests, but it does bother them because they might actually be seeing how silly they look to us.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
You have no interest in Nagy's belief, but you're more than happy to preach at him about your persuasion?
I don't recall preaching. Pretty sure I didn't.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
mark merrens wrote:
I don't recall preaching.
mark merrens wrote:
I have no interest in your personal insanity./blockquote> Just saying. :-D
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
-
I don't view it as mockery. It may not be good natured satire, but it is making a joke out of what the religious groups had done by essentially doing the exact same thing as them, only without any god based religious meaning. It shouldn't bother the religious groups, since there is no god given power given to the aethiests, but it does bother them because they might actually be seeing how silly they look to us.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
wizardzz wrote:
making a joke out of what the religious groups had done
Is the definition of mocking.
wizardzz wrote:
It shouldn't bother the religious groups
I agree. My only point is the hypocrisy the atheists make in desiring to proscribe religious speech, yet want protection for theirs.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
wizardzz wrote:
making a joke out of what the religious groups had done
Is the definition of mocking.
wizardzz wrote:
It shouldn't bother the religious groups
I agree. My only point is the hypocrisy the atheists make in desiring to proscribe religious speech, yet want protection for theirs.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
wizardzz wrote:
making a joke out of what the religious groups had done
Is the definition of mocking.
Is the definition of satire.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
I agree. My only point is the hypocrisy the atheists make in desiring to proscribe religious speech, yet want protection for theirs.
And what better way to show how absurd something than do it yourself without all meaning, this is satire still.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
wizardzz wrote:
making a joke out of what the religious groups had done
Is the definition of mocking.
Is the definition of satire.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
I agree. My only point is the hypocrisy the atheists make in desiring to proscribe religious speech, yet want protection for theirs.
And what better way to show how absurd something than do it yourself without all meaning, this is satire still.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
I see we wont agree on the satire/mocking thing, and I suppose it's a find distinction. In any case, it's certainly hypocritical to do the same thing that they don't believe in themselves.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
I see we wont agree on the satire/mocking thing, and I suppose it's a find distinction. In any case, it's certainly hypocritical to do the same thing that they don't believe in themselves.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
it's certainly hypocritical to do the same thing that they don't believe in themselves.
How can you say that when it's devoid of meaning and to prove a point. It's basically sarcasm acted out.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
Atheists use ‘unholy water’ to ‘unbless’ Florida highway[^] Since atheists don't believe in God or the Divine nor in the Holy or in Blessings, how can they believe in anything "unholy" or in "unblessing"? If you are "undoing" something doesn't that mean you give credence to the "doing" of a thing? Just a thought. I don't really care one way or the other. Just seems contradictory and hypocritical to me for an atheist to "undo" anything that a religionist "does".
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
If you are "undoing" something doesn't that mean you give credence to the "doing" of a thing?
Pretty sure atheists can try to attract media attention just like any other group. Also rather certain that they can be intelligent enough to understand what they are doing has no metaphysical meaning.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Just seems contradictory and hypocritical to me for an atheist to "undo" anything that a religionist "does".
Versus the vast number of hypocrisies that exist within religions?
-
mark merrens wrote:
keep your beliefs to yourself.
I see. Understandable. I don't want someone screaming in my face either. Does this extend to political, scientific, mathematical, etc beliefs and ideas differing from yours? If so, you must want to live in a very quiet and boring world.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
I see. Understandable. I don't want someone screaming in my face either.
Does this extend to political, scientific, mathematical, etc beliefs and ideas differing from yours?Where do you live exactly? I am curious how many times a day a mathematician/scientist walks up to you and starts "screaming" at you about some mathematical topic. And also is there a theme which connects all of the mathematical/scientific discourse or does each one have their own agenda?
-
If only we could enforce the same laws today. There would be no Hollywood.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
it's certainly hypocritical to do the same thing that they don't believe in themselves.
How can you say that when it's devoid of meaning and to prove a point. It's basically sarcasm acted out.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
If you believe an act has no meaning when performed by someone else, then it is hypocritical to perform the same act to "undo" the one performed by the first. If the first act has no meaning and the atheist believes he and nobody else has such power to bless something, then it is hypocritical to perform said powerless act to undo the powerless act of the first. The atheist is "pretending" to beliefs he does not hold to be true. Of course, if this were an act making fun of black people or jews or women it would be seen for the prejudiced bigotry that it really is. In addition, it is hypocritical because the atheists are being intolerant of others beliefs and views when they demand tolerance and acceptance of their own.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
All I can say, when the vampire hordes come screaming over the parapets, I want the pontiff beside me blessing that water like there's no tomorrow. I ain't going to put my faith in Dawkins, blessing a particularly fine Chateau Neuf de Pap with Dracula champing at my heels.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
All I can say, when the vampire hordes come screaming over the parapets, I want the pontiff beside me blessing that water like there's no tomorrow.
Sure. But in the same way when the telepathic aliens arrive to enslave all of humanity you will wish for the local nut job that knows how to make protective hats from tin foil.
-
Naerling wrote:
atheists weren't
I'm not so sure. It certainly is funny, and I had a laugh. But it's an "in-your-face" kind of thing that makes them look petty and stupid.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
But it's an "in-your-face" kind of thing that makes them look petty and stupid.
...Except of course that it was probably planned specifically to show the ridiculous of the other action along with drawing media attention to that. So neither petty nor stupid.
-
If you believe an act has no meaning when performed by someone else, then it is hypocritical to perform the same act to "undo" the one performed by the first. If the first act has no meaning and the atheist believes he and nobody else has such power to bless something, then it is hypocritical to perform said powerless act to undo the powerless act of the first. The atheist is "pretending" to beliefs he does not hold to be true. Of course, if this were an act making fun of black people or jews or women it would be seen for the prejudiced bigotry that it really is. In addition, it is hypocritical because the atheists are being intolerant of others beliefs and views when they demand tolerance and acceptance of their own.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
If the first act has no meaning and the atheist believes he and nobody else has such power to bless something, then it is hypocritical to perform said powerless act to undo the powerless act of the first.
Nope, it is showing how absurd religion and all its rituals are via satire; by showing that anyone can make up beliefs and do what they want under the protection of religion.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Of course, if this were an act making fun of black people or jews or women it would be seen for the prejudiced bigotry that it really is.
When people of any group do something that is absurd, it will likely be satired.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
If you are "undoing" something doesn't that mean you give credence to the "doing" of a thing?
Pretty sure atheists can try to attract media attention just like any other group. Also rather certain that they can be intelligent enough to understand what they are doing has no metaphysical meaning.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Just seems contradictory and hypocritical to me for an atheist to "undo" anything that a religionist "does".
Versus the vast number of hypocrisies that exist within religions?
jschell wrote:
Pretty sure atheists can try to attract media attention just like any other group.
I'm pretty sure that was the object as well as to mock and deride other people for their beliefs.
jschell wrote:
Also rather certain that they can be intelligent enough to understand what they are doing has no metaphysical meaning.
Certainly. Which makes them all the greater hypocrits
jschell wrote:
Versus the vast number of hypocrisies that exist within religions?
False logic. But thanks for the tacit agreement that what they did was hypocritical and intolerant.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
mark merrens wrote:
If you have a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother then you ain't Jewish.
That would have been a great consolation to my (half) great aunts had Germany invaded the UK. :)
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
I doubt it would have made any difference.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
If the first act has no meaning and the atheist believes he and nobody else has such power to bless something, then it is hypocritical to perform said powerless act to undo the powerless act of the first.
Nope, it is showing how absurd religion and all its rituals are via satire; by showing that anyone can make up beliefs and do what they want under the protection of religion.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Of course, if this were an act making fun of black people or jews or women it would be seen for the prejudiced bigotry that it really is.
When people of any group do something that is absurd, it will likely be satired.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
wizardzz wrote:
When people of any group do something that is absurd, it will likely be satired.
What a clever way to hide and justify your bigotry.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
I don't view it as mockery. It may not be good natured satire, but it is making a joke out of what the religious groups had done by essentially doing the exact same thing as them, only without any god based religious meaning. It shouldn't bother the religious groups, since there is no god given power given to the aethiests, but it does bother them because they might actually be seeing how silly they look to us.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
wizardzz wrote:
It shouldn't bother the religious groups, since there is no god given power given to the aethiests, but it does bother them because they might actually be seeing how silly they look to us.
To my way of thinking why would another group care? Unless both of the following are true. 1. They thought such a thing was possible - thus their religion must allow it. 2. They thought that the people of the other religion could enact a power of a different religion.