Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Why Javascript is a Joy

Why Javascript is a Joy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
javascriptphpperlcom
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Terrence Dorsey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    AC[^]:

    Yes, Javascript can be surprisingly elegant yet completely infuriating, and all on the same line of code; for a long time, it remained the joke of the programming community, the deranged cousin that outuglied even the likes of PHP and Perl. Nowadays, JS is the language in the spotlight. Here’s my attempt to collate exactly why I like working with Javascript.

    4 reasons why JavaScript is awesome.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Terrence Dorsey

      AC[^]:

      Yes, Javascript can be surprisingly elegant yet completely infuriating, and all on the same line of code; for a long time, it remained the joke of the programming community, the deranged cousin that outuglied even the likes of PHP and Perl. Nowadays, JS is the language in the spotlight. Here’s my attempt to collate exactly why I like working with Javascript.

      4 reasons why JavaScript is awesome.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Clifford Nelson
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Javascript was never intended for what it is now used for in the web. First of all it does not play well with HTML/XML. The "<" and ">" should not have been used in the language syntax. Could have used soemthing like PowerScripts ".lt" and ".gt". Anything in the syntax that was not be incompatible with XML. Second it is C-like but not. It should be much closer to C if it is going to be C like, and being C like would have made it easier for all the Java and C# (and C++) programmers out there. It does provide a lot of power, which is good, but any programming language could have once it had been limited to what made sense.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups