Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Victoria Windsor (AKA Victoria Saxe Coburg Gothe) is an illegitamate fake

Victoria Windsor (AKA Victoria Saxe Coburg Gothe) is an illegitamate fake

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comquestion
33 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    You're such a whiny prick. Long live the Queen!

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    _Josh_ wrote:

    Long live the Queen!

    Who is that then, Elton John? :laugh:

    ============================== Nothing to say.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Britain's Real Monarch She is descended from an illegitimate line. The true monarch is an Australian guy, a Lord in fact, whose ancestors were pretty much all killed in an attempt to legitimise the line of Henry the 7th, but obviously they didnt get them all, leaving this guy. So, anarchy reigns! Racing on the Queens highway is no longer an offence wince she isnt the rightful queen! Head of the church of England? Forget it! She is a fraud, a bastardised illegitimate! So lets send the German trollop a nice message on her fraudulent usurping of the crown for 60 years: "Fuck you you rancid bitch!" :laugh: :laugh:

      ============================== Nothing to say.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dalek Dave
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      There was no Victoria Winsor.

      --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dalek Dave

        There was no Victoria Winsor.

        --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        You reckon? I read it was her who changed her name... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Victoria "She married her first cousin" Fucking inbreds! OK, it was George the fifth. Anyway, they are still German inbreds, what ever you say! :)

        ============================== Nothing to say.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Britain's Real Monarch She is descended from an illegitimate line. The true monarch is an Australian guy, a Lord in fact, whose ancestors were pretty much all killed in an attempt to legitimise the line of Henry the 7th, but obviously they didnt get them all, leaving this guy. So, anarchy reigns! Racing on the Queens highway is no longer an offence wince she isnt the rightful queen! Head of the church of England? Forget it! She is a fraud, a bastardised illegitimate! So lets send the German trollop a nice message on her fraudulent usurping of the crown for 60 years: "Fuck you you rancid bitch!" :laugh: :laugh:

          ============================== Nothing to say.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          and who kicked over your stone? you should try to be a fraction of the human being she is, you are a troll of the worst elphanting kind

          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Britain's Real Monarch She is descended from an illegitimate line. The true monarch is an Australian guy, a Lord in fact, whose ancestors were pretty much all killed in an attempt to legitimise the line of Henry the 7th, but obviously they didnt get them all, leaving this guy. So, anarchy reigns! Racing on the Queens highway is no longer an offence wince she isnt the rightful queen! Head of the church of England? Forget it! She is a fraud, a bastardised illegitimate! So lets send the German trollop a nice message on her fraudulent usurping of the crown for 60 years: "Fuck you you rancid bitch!" :laugh: :laugh:

            ============================== Nothing to say.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Andersson
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Thanks for a link to a really interesting program. Best part was of course when I realized that the presenter/narrator was Baldrick.

            Light moves faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak. List of common misconceptions

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jorgen Andersson

              Thanks for a link to a really interesting program. Best part was of course when I realized that the presenter/narrator was Baldrick.

              Light moves faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak. List of common misconceptions

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              The ending is great! A Hausfrau buying bratwurst! :laugh:

              ============================== Nothing to say.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                and who kicked over your stone? you should try to be a fraction of the human being she is, you are a troll of the worst elphanting kind

                You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Actually I found the link quite interesting. Fundamentally so. Plus I have never liked her starchiness. The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land. That she has destroyed her children's lives with her meddling and that she isnt even British. If you chose to worship her thats your problem.

                ============================== Nothing to say.

                B L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Actually I found the link quite interesting. Fundamentally so. Plus I have never liked her starchiness. The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land. That she has destroyed her children's lives with her meddling and that she isnt even British. If you chose to worship her thats your problem.

                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  head of states are ALLWAYS supported by the tax payer's and a president would likely cost more (based on what Blair costs) destroyed her children's lives- realy how exactly? as for being British, that is one hell of a racist remark, someone who was born here and of parent that were also born here and so were both of his grandparents so exactly what do you have to be to fit your britishness? I dont worship her I respect her, something I certainly do not do with you, just piddle off to your foreign hole and stop dissing your betters

                  You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                    head of states are ALLWAYS supported by the tax payer's and a president would likely cost more (based on what Blair costs) destroyed her children's lives- realy how exactly? as for being British, that is one hell of a racist remark, someone who was born here and of parent that were also born here and so were both of his grandparents so exactly what do you have to be to fit your britishness? I dont worship her I respect her, something I certainly do not do with you, just piddle off to your foreign hole and stop dissing your betters

                    You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                    as for being British

                    Ha, and who had to abdicate because he wanted a non UK wife? And as for ruining her kids lives, she wouldnt let charles marry cmailla insead forcing him into an arranged marriage, that ended up destroying lives. But why do you respect someone who has done nothing on her own, of her own volition? She is where she is through accident of birth. That doesnt make her special or give me any reason to respect her. If on the other hand she actually DID something by using her position, then I might. Personally I have more respect for Charles. As nuts as he is at least he TRIES to make a difference in the world. As did Diana, although much of that seemed PR related. Hope their sons (cough cough) are better.

                    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                    just piddle off to your foreign hole

                    Yeah, I am not a patriot. I have a wider sense of belonging than that. You think thats a bad thing. I dont.

                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                      as for being British

                      Ha, and who had to abdicate because he wanted a non UK wife? And as for ruining her kids lives, she wouldnt let charles marry cmailla insead forcing him into an arranged marriage, that ended up destroying lives. But why do you respect someone who has done nothing on her own, of her own volition? She is where she is through accident of birth. That doesnt make her special or give me any reason to respect her. If on the other hand she actually DID something by using her position, then I might. Personally I have more respect for Charles. As nuts as he is at least he TRIES to make a difference in the world. As did Diana, although much of that seemed PR related. Hope their sons (cough cough) are better.

                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                      just piddle off to your foreign hole

                      Yeah, I am not a patriot. I have a wider sense of belonging than that. You think thats a bad thing. I dont.

                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      I dont remember anyone abicating because they wanted a foreign wife, there was one guy who wanted to marry a Divorcee which at the time was a nono is this what you mean, for a Brit your history is abit iffy and you know that she prevented him marrying Camilla is this the Camilla he is married to? I am supprised with this level of insider knowledge you are so anti royal did something as in? she is head of state but parliment is the elective govenment, she makes ssure she does not get publiclly involved but how much she is involved in private is anyones guess as for her works , i doubt you have done asmuch for the people of the UK in your life as she has in aweek in fact the best thing you ever did was to leave I know your not a patriot you are closer to a traitor, you claim you have a wider sense of belonging yet you never miss a chance at slagging off the UK.

                      You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Actually I found the link quite interesting. Fundamentally so. Plus I have never liked her starchiness. The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land. That she has destroyed her children's lives with her meddling and that she isnt even British. If you chose to worship her thats your problem.

                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Erudite_Eric wrote:

                        The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land.

                        The profits of the Royal Estate were surrendered to the Treasury in exchange for the Civil List by King George III. The monies paid into the Treasury directly generated by the Royal Family exceed the money taken out, and that is before you add in hundreds of millions more in international tourism that they generate for the country. I would much rather the current system than the alternative which would have been President Tone or Dave.

                        Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                          I dont remember anyone abicating because they wanted a foreign wife, there was one guy who wanted to marry a Divorcee which at the time was a nono is this what you mean, for a Brit your history is abit iffy and you know that she prevented him marrying Camilla is this the Camilla he is married to? I am supprised with this level of insider knowledge you are so anti royal did something as in? she is head of state but parliment is the elective govenment, she makes ssure she does not get publiclly involved but how much she is involved in private is anyones guess as for her works , i doubt you have done asmuch for the people of the UK in your life as she has in aweek in fact the best thing you ever did was to leave I know your not a patriot you are closer to a traitor, you claim you have a wider sense of belonging yet you never miss a chance at slagging off the UK.

                          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                          you are closer to a traitor

                          :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Grow up for christs sake, what do you think this is, the twelfth century?

                          ============================== Nothing to say.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                            you are closer to a traitor

                            :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Grow up for christs sake, what do you think this is, the twelfth century?

                            ============================== Nothing to say.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad, you insult the country of your birth and conveintly forget all the issues of these other countries you are so happy to champion. yes traitor is a old term that maybe should return, you have the right to your opinion something that this country has fought for. and i did not call you a traitor I just pointed out that you are closer to the definition of one than you are to the definition of a patriot, but then again you probably think that being a patriot is also something from history ps why the 12th century? are you saying that the last traitor was so long ago? of is this this another case of your poor understanding of history

                            You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Erudite_Eric wrote:

                              The fact she is supported by the tax payer, when she earns so much off her land.

                              The profits of the Royal Estate were surrendered to the Treasury in exchange for the Civil List by King George III. The monies paid into the Treasury directly generated by the Royal Family exceed the money taken out, and that is before you add in hundreds of millions more in international tourism that they generate for the country. I would much rather the current system than the alternative which would have been President Tone or Dave.

                              Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Not all the estates were surrendered by the way. It is not so much that I am anti monarch, yes, a monarchy is a bit of fun, and encourage tourism, it is just that she is out of date, so out of touch with the modern world, and the position an monarch should adopt. Charles is better, but he has no hope of becoming king, but at least he uses his position to try to make a difference in the world.

                              ============================== Nothing to say.

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                                no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad, you insult the country of your birth and conveintly forget all the issues of these other countries you are so happy to champion. yes traitor is a old term that maybe should return, you have the right to your opinion something that this country has fought for. and i did not call you a traitor I just pointed out that you are closer to the definition of one than you are to the definition of a patriot, but then again you probably think that being a patriot is also something from history ps why the 12th century? are you saying that the last traitor was so long ago? of is this this another case of your poor understanding of history

                                You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                                no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad

                                Tetchy! :laugh:

                                Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                                you insult the country of your birth

                                No, I insulted a Queen, who isnt even the rightful sovereign. As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

                                ============================== Nothing to say.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                                  no i just feel that you are a prat who thinks that he is somehow superior just because he lives abroad

                                  Tetchy! :laugh:

                                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                                  you insult the country of your birth

                                  No, I insulted a Queen, who isnt even the rightful sovereign. As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

                                  ============================== Nothing to say.

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  and I insulted a troll. and yes you can call your post a collection of

                                  Erudite_Eric wrote:

                                  As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

                                  you insult someone and then go nahnah when pulled about it I dont know why I bother with such a small minded twit, you think that insulting my head of state is clever, its not its easy to do and hold little value accept to anger people who respect her, now that is the behavour of a troll, maybe you would prefer a president for life as a head of state? or maybe the winner of big brother (much closer to you level of intellect i guess) you realy do have a problem with England dont you, what is it were you fightened by a Union flag when you were a child?

                                  You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                                    and I insulted a troll. and yes you can call your post a collection of

                                    Erudite_Eric wrote:

                                    As for the rest, blah blah blah, lame insults and pedantry.

                                    you insult someone and then go nahnah when pulled about it I dont know why I bother with such a small minded twit, you think that insulting my head of state is clever, its not its easy to do and hold little value accept to anger people who respect her, now that is the behavour of a troll, maybe you would prefer a president for life as a head of state? or maybe the winner of big brother (much closer to you level of intellect i guess) you realy do have a problem with England dont you, what is it were you fightened by a Union flag when you were a child?

                                    You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Wow, I never met anyone who had swallowed the BS as much as you. Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches! You mug.

                                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Wow, I never met anyone who had swallowed the BS as much as you. Go ahead, die for your country! Throw you life away in the meaningless BS of patriotism, duty and pride. All in order to keep the incumbent power class in riches! You mug.

                                      ============================== Nothing to say.

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      now whos touchy maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship sounds like you have a big chip and feel so badly done to. oh and what BS as the biggest shoveler around here is you

                                      You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Not all the estates were surrendered by the way. It is not so much that I am anti monarch, yes, a monarchy is a bit of fun, and encourage tourism, it is just that she is out of date, so out of touch with the modern world, and the position an monarch should adopt. Charles is better, but he has no hope of becoming king, but at least he uses his position to try to make a difference in the world.

                                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                                        B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        all the royal estates were surrendered, at the begining of Victoria's rule the Crown had no assets, it was Victoria's rule and the canny investment of personnel wealth (most of which was Hubby's so German wealth) which meant that they were serious land owners at the end, but you dont like fact getting in the way of your rant do you. Its amazing how much inside infor you have? do you work for the Queen? as everyone seem to say she is down to earth and very much in tune with the modern world, something you seem to be ammiss

                                        You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                                          now whos touchy maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship sounds like you have a big chip and feel so badly done to. oh and what BS as the biggest shoveler around here is you

                                          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                                          maybe you do mean this and would have been so happy under a dictatorship

                                          Now there is logical reasoning for you. (Sarcasm intended).

                                          ============================== Nothing to say.

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups