Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Will the US become a theocracy?

Will the US become a theocracy?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomhelpquestion
28 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Shannon

    They guy speaks with a religoius group and that means we are becoming a theocracy? What would you have him do? Arrest them for defying the moral authority of the state? "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

    E Offline
    E Offline
    Ed Gadziemski
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Arrest them for defying the moral authority of the state? That would be a good start. All those idiots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, et.al. should be sentenced to life in prison.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K KaRl

      From another newspaper belonging to the World Communist Conspiracy against the Good, the International Herald Tribune: Bush looks to religion as a way to help U.S[^] I fear in a few months GWB will begin to have visions. I hope he won't have the same as Saint John.


      Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paul Watson
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      KaЯl wrote: the International Herald Tribune Such a nice site. Good design, good ideas, and colum layout for text. Good stuff. Show this to clients as a Good Site TM

      Paul Watson
      Bluegrass
      Cape Town, South Africa

      Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        Debs wrote: something like 50% of people in the House of Representatives believed in creationism :omg: Debs wrote: They were talking of people who seriously believed that the earth was created something like 10000 years ago :wtf: Do they also believe Earth is the center of the Universe? ;)


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        KaЯl wrote: Do they also believe Earth is the center of the Universe? No, Washington :~ The tigress is here :-D

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          From another newspaper belonging to the World Communist Conspiracy against the Good, the International Herald Tribune: Bush looks to religion as a way to help U.S[^] I fear in a few months GWB will begin to have visions. I hope he won't have the same as Saint John.


          Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          From the article: "But governments can and should support effective social services provided by religious people, so long as they work, and as long as those services go to anyone in need, regardless of their faith" "Declaring that discrimination against religious charitable groups should end, the president said, "If a charity's helping the needy, it should not matter if there's a rabbi on the board or a cross on the wall or a crescent on the wall or a religious commitment in the charter." Just an observation for those who haven't read it. The tigress is here :-D

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            From the article: "But governments can and should support effective social services provided by religious people, so long as they work, and as long as those services go to anyone in need, regardless of their faith" "Declaring that discrimination against religious charitable groups should end, the president said, "If a charity's helping the needy, it should not matter if there's a rabbi on the board or a cross on the wall or a crescent on the wall or a religious commitment in the charter." Just an observation for those who haven't read it. The tigress is here :-D

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Anna Jayne Metcalfe
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Trollslayer wrote: "But governments can and should support effective social services provided by religious people, so long as they work, and as long as those services go to anyone in need, regardless of their faith" "Declaring that discrimination against religious charitable groups should end, the president said, "If a charity's helping the needy, it should not matter if there's a rabbi on the board or a cross on the wall or a crescent on the wall or a religious commitment in the charter." Nothing wrong with that at all. Some of the Christian Aid groups (Tear Fund spring to mind) are doing amazing things out there, and certainly have my support. Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

            "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
            - Marcia Graesch

            Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              KaЯl wrote: Do they also believe Earth is the center of the Universe? No, Washington :~ The tigress is here :-D

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KaRl
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              :-D Or their navel?


              Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                From another newspaper belonging to the World Communist Conspiracy against the Good, the International Herald Tribune: Bush looks to religion as a way to help U.S[^] I fear in a few months GWB will begin to have visions. I hope he won't have the same as Saint John.


                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                B Offline
                B Offline
                brianwelsch
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                :zzz: BW "Gandalf. Yes. That is what they used to call me. Gandalf the Grey. *I* am Gandalf the White." - Gandalf the White

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Ed Gadziemski

                  Arrest them for defying the moral authority of the state? That would be a good start. All those idiots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, et.al. should be sentenced to life in prison.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Ed Gadziemski wrote: idiots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, et.al. They don't scare me nearly as much as you do. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Ed Gadziemski wrote: idiots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, et.al. They don't scare me nearly as much as you do. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    Ed Gadziemski
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    They don't scare me nearly as much as you do. The truth hurts, doesn't it. All those religious quacks preying on feeble minds like yours must be stopped. You don't even realize how brainwashed you are.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Ed Gadziemski

                      They don't scare me nearly as much as you do. The truth hurts, doesn't it. All those religious quacks preying on feeble minds like yours must be stopped. You don't even realize how brainwashed you are.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      It is my loathing of any religion which makes me fear you. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        It is my loathing of any religion which makes me fear you. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        Ed Gadziemski
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        It is my loathing of any religion which makes me fear you. :confused: As an atheist, I have somehow missed your point. Please elaborate. Are you for or against the US becoming a theocracy? In my opinion, we are getting closer and closer. The 1st Amendment line between church and state is becoming very thin.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Ed Gadziemski

                          It is my loathing of any religion which makes me fear you. :confused: As an atheist, I have somehow missed your point. Please elaborate. Are you for or against the US becoming a theocracy? In my opinion, we are getting closer and closer. The 1st Amendment line between church and state is becoming very thin.

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Stan Shannon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Ed Gadziemski wrote: Are you for or against the US becoming a theocracy? In my opinion, we are getting closer and closer. We are, but the threat is not coming from christianity to is coming from the direction of anti-christians. Religion, as such, serves the purpose of establish a set of moral parameters. Christianity is merely one means of doing that. The secular left-wing has a moral agenda which has displaced the moral authority of more tradtional religions. The politics of the left *is* a set of religious values being used to purposefully replace Christianity. While not overtly religious, and perhaps an athiest, I do try to adher to a set of Christian values as I understand them. I do not appreciate being compelled by the state to subvert my values for those of an alien religion (Secular Humanism, or whatever you want to call it). The first amendment asserts free exercise of religion much more firmly than it asserts "separation" of church and state. What is the purpose of having spearation of church and state if the state merely assumes the role of a church in the promulgation of its own moral agenda while overtly supressing competing codes of moral ethics? That *is* a theocracy, full blown and well established. You are comfortable with it because it is a theocracy of values that you subscribe to. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                          E 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stan Shannon

                            Ed Gadziemski wrote: Are you for or against the US becoming a theocracy? In my opinion, we are getting closer and closer. We are, but the threat is not coming from christianity to is coming from the direction of anti-christians. Religion, as such, serves the purpose of establish a set of moral parameters. Christianity is merely one means of doing that. The secular left-wing has a moral agenda which has displaced the moral authority of more tradtional religions. The politics of the left *is* a set of religious values being used to purposefully replace Christianity. While not overtly religious, and perhaps an athiest, I do try to adher to a set of Christian values as I understand them. I do not appreciate being compelled by the state to subvert my values for those of an alien religion (Secular Humanism, or whatever you want to call it). The first amendment asserts free exercise of religion much more firmly than it asserts "separation" of church and state. What is the purpose of having spearation of church and state if the state merely assumes the role of a church in the promulgation of its own moral agenda while overtly supressing competing codes of moral ethics? That *is* a theocracy, full blown and well established. You are comfortable with it because it is a theocracy of values that you subscribe to. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            Ed Gadziemski
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            What is the purpose of having spearation of church and state if the state merely assumes the role of a church in the promulgation of its own moral agenda while overtly supressing competing codes of moral ethics? Are you saying that John Ashcroft's moral agenda is the correct one? Do you think the statue of Justice needs a sheet covering her breasts? You are comfortable with it because it is a theocracy of values that you subscribe to. That is an overgeneralization based on your assumption of my beliefs. I'm a liberal regarding intellectual pursuits, a libertarian regarding limited government, and a conservative regarding fiscal policy. Conservative, that is, in the older sense, where you don't run massive budget deficits. Unlike Bush & Co., I want balanced budgets, low spending, and low taxes.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups