Where does it end?
-
You do C#, but not LINQ and lambda? How do you work with collections, write out each foreach loop every time?
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
Foreach is inefficient, for loops rule.
I think/hope you're missing a joke icon :laugh:
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
A shame you didn't recognize it. It's an indication that my code is, indeed, 'clever'... Not sure how to make it more readable though (I guess this is the part where it becomes a programming question :laugh: ).
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
Have you considered adding a comment? I find that's generally a good idea for clever code (with or without quotes).
It's funny you should say that. While you certainly make a valid point allow me to explain why I don't think that's the solution. If the code is so unclear it needs comments I really think you should stop and have another look at your code. Try rewriting it so that it shouldn't need comments (which is what I did). If there's really nothing else you can do you can use a comment, but I highly discourage it. I've said it before and I'll say it now; comments are the evil of this world :) In fact I've had so much bad experiences with comments that I've written a tip about it a few years ago. If you're interested: Write comments that matter[^]. Thanks for the tip though :thumbsup:
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
