.Net Obfuscation
-
Sometime back i had asked if anybody would be intrested in an article on how to decrypt IL strings in an obfuscated assembly. I got the feeling that CP wasn't the place for such a thing, for the guys who were intrested i have outlined the technique in this post[^]on my blog[^].
I always think that the idea of a compiler that compiles another compiler or itself is rather incestuous in a binary way. - Colin Davies My .Net Blog
-
Sometime back i had asked if anybody would be intrested in an article on how to decrypt IL strings in an obfuscated assembly. I got the feeling that CP wasn't the place for such a thing, for the guys who were intrested i have outlined the technique in this post[^]on my blog[^].
I always think that the idea of a compiler that compiles another compiler or itself is rather incestuous in a binary way. - Colin Davies My .Net Blog
Maybe it's an article more suited to neworder.box.sk. Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski
-
Maybe it's an article more suited to neworder.box.sk. Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski
Yeah Daniel I remember :)
I always think that the idea of a compiler that compiles another compiler or itself is rather incestuous in a binary way. - Colin Davies My .Net Blog
-
Sometime back i had asked if anybody would be intrested in an article on how to decrypt IL strings in an obfuscated assembly. I got the feeling that CP wasn't the place for such a thing, for the guys who were intrested i have outlined the technique in this post[^]on my blog[^].
I always think that the idea of a compiler that compiles another compiler or itself is rather incestuous in a binary way. - Colin Davies My .Net Blog
-
Sijin wrote: I got the feeling that CP wasn't the place for such a thing Why not?
Flirt harder, I'm a Coder
mlog || Agile Programming | doxygenpeterchen wrote: Why not? Because CP would need a new section, "crackz, serialz and warez" for this kind of article. Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski
-
Yeah Daniel I remember :)
I always think that the idea of a compiler that compiles another compiler or itself is rather incestuous in a binary way. - Colin Davies My .Net Blog
Sijin wrote: Yeah Daniel I remember It didn't seem so :) Perl combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. -- Jamie Zawinski