Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Will Mono Become the Preferred Platform for Linux Development?

Will Mono Become the Preferred Platform for Linux Development?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcomlinuxquestion
42 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Joel Holdsworth

    Well mostly because it is a horrible language. I'm so fed up with dollar signs, and the set of functions although extensive are really badly layed out e.g. horrible function names. The end result code is never pretty or readable. Joel Holdsworth

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Alot of the function names are taken from C. Unless you dislike C, how's that so horrible? Jeremy Falcon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      ASP.NET has far more functionality out of the box than PHP, a factor you used to compare PHP to ASP. I find it a better tool for most of the websites I do than PHP. If I needed a very simple website then I would use ASP as I would not need all the PHP or ASP.NET functionality and it runs on the same hosting as our ASP.NET sites. But use the tool that fits the requirements. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass South Africa Christopher Duncan quoted: "...that would require my explaining Einstein's Fear of Relatives" Crikey! ain't life grand? Einstein says...

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jeremy Falcon
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Paul Watson wrote: ASP.NET has far more functionality out of the box than PHP Are you sure about this? And if so, care to give some examples? Really, I'm being objective and would like to know. One example for PHP is, AFAIK out of the box you can't even write a PDF file with ASP.NET, but with PHP you have been able since 4.0. I haven't started using ASP.NET, and from what I hear it does leaps and bounds over ASP. It's just unnerving when I hear some people (I'm not talking about you) dis PHP or anything - like Macs - when they know little about it. Jeremy Falcon

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups