You can't really blame this guy for not wanting to try anything out for himself, it's an extremely easy route to try in life. I blame it on the parents.

That's awesomely fantastic that is. Can anyone decipher this?

Amazingly enough I just googled ftp error codes and it gave me a list of all the ftp error codes. Maybe you should try.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=http+authentication+with+c%23&meta=[^]

Depends on the kind of authentication the site requires, if the site uses cookies to set authentication, then use cookies in your code.

It's not introducing a bug, if you had read the original thread from a few days ago you'd realise that this is what the OP wanted - 'convert "aabb" to "aAbB" and set it to the textbox as quickly as possible'. Thanks.

You could store it in the registry. http://www.codeproject.com/cs/system/modifyregistry.asp[^]

Here's my code. I'm using a standard textbox.

		textBox2.Clear();	
			DateTime dt = DateTime.Now;
			StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(@"C:\test\test.txt");
			char[] c = sr.ReadToEnd().ToCharArray();
			progressBar1.Maximum = c.Length;

			for (int i = 0; i < c.Length; i += 2)
			{
				if ((int)c[i] >= 97 && (int)c[i] <= 122)
					c[i] = (char)((int)c[i] - 32);

				if (i % 10000 == 0)
					progressBar1.Value = i;
			}

			textBox2.AppendText(new string(c));

			MessageBox.Show((DateTime.Now.Ticks - dt.Ticks).ToString());

Note that a textbox does only store 32k of text, but if your assignment says you just have to fill a textbox, then you are only doing what it says...

I can process a 20 meg file and display it with appendtext in 4 seconds.

Instead of using txtbox_result.Text = new string(text); Do this txtbox_result.AppendText(new string(text));

You could even call your progress bar update fewer times than you are, with a 20 meg file you're currently calling the progress bar update more than 20,000 times. If this takes 10 secs to go through the for loop, that's 2000 progress bar updates per second, bit of overkill there.

I'm not too sure about putting text into a textbox quicker, but if you definately know that every 2nd character is a letter, then using text[i] = (char)((int)text[i] - 32); is quicker than using text[i] = char.ToUpper(text[i]);

Wouldn't using a char[] be faster than using a StringBuilder? char[] c = sr.ReadToEnd().ToCharArray(); for (int i = 0; i < c.Length; i+=2) { c[i] = (char)((int)c[i] - 32); }

You could go through the text as a char array and just subtract 32 from each other char to get uppercase. Might be a little faster.

The reason it's not working is because the maximum length of a query string in IE is 2048 characters. Check System.Web.Mail for sending emails.

I'm not sure if this will help you. string[] drives = Environment.GetLogicalDrives();

Have you googled for this? I just googled for "forum software c#" and got 4.5 million results, how about that!

Can't you just do this? double d = 128.158676; Convert.ToDouble(Convert.ToInt32(d * 10)) / 10;

Do the following textBox1.PasswordChar = '\0';

Very true, in that case - ]*src=[^>]*> That's even if he needs the src= bit in there, would probably work as ]*>