Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
C

chrysten

@chrysten
About
Posts
1
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Die COBOL... Die!!
    C chrysten

    Absolutely. One really must remember that everything has its own place and purpose. Event-driven models, forced to sit behind/in a gui framework, just do not fit transactional processing. Remember, transactional processing is back-office, streams of items in, process, filter, archive, and out - stuff that procedural languages COBOL/PLI/ALGOL/FORTRAN/C - can do extremely well and concisely - all with little fluff, transfer vectors for each instantiation, etc., etc. Sometimes it is appropriate to apply structure, abstraction, dynamic binding, etc, to transactional processing - implementable readily in C (and even COBOL with a little preprocessing) - but that is only structure and expression. That does not make COBOL any more appropriate for events driven by HUMAN interaction, nor C++/Net appropriate for transactions. chrysg

    The Lounge question csharp html com business
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups