Just because something has been done in the past, does not make it right! In fact it relates to the dangerous nature of our governments more recent activities. If the federal government makes laws, and later chooses not to follow them because it is inconvenient, then they are not laws at all. If our government is willing to violate a constitutional law that has been unchanged since our countries formation, then what’s to stop them from violating other sections of the constitution, like the Bill of Rights? As far as your reference to Section 8 Clause 10 “To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;” The Senate did follow proper procedure when it authorized the president to use force as a last resort to enforce the UN resolution. However, he did not use force as a last resort, and he did not use it to enforce the UN resolution. The UN Resolution only called for Iraq to fully disclose to weapons inspectors, its WMD programs so that they could be dismantled if they existed. This does not mean invading the country and destroying its government before allowing inspections to continue, which was completely unnecessary. Furthermore, once Bush crossed the line by openly stating we were going to war with Iraq, he invalidates the use of Clause 10 and brings up the use of Clause 11, which states that only the Senate can declare war. Thus, IMO he overstepped his authority, but the only way to get a direct answer on whether this is to proper way to interpret the constitution would be to take it to the Supreme Court, and no one seems to have the guts to do that yet. I do not dispute that we have the right to defend ourselves against Al Queda, or to bring Bin Laden to justice, because we clearly have that right, but I still think we should hold our government accountable for following its own laws in doing so. I agree that the president’s oath and responsibility is to protect the US and not the UN, but it was agreed when the UN was formed that it was in our best interest to work within its framework. It is unwise for our government to take arrogant unilateral action on matters of diplomacy, and in effect anger our allies because we are heavily dependent upon foreign oil and foreign investment. Both of which could easily dry up if Bush goes too far. It may not be the quickest or most convenient way to do things but it tends to work better in the long run. Daniel Petersen President Pulsar Enterprise