Bit-Smacker wrote:
o my original point, why would you be running a $500-$800 per license OS on a "budget off-the-shelf windows desktop"?
My apologies for being vague! My point was that the equivalent slipstreaming is done for XP/Vista/Windows 7 desktops as it is for the server images - that is that extended installation images are not a premium feature. Further, especially given that the tools to create them are available at no extra charge, one would expect deployments on any scale to have an in-house image to use.
Bit-Smacker wrote:
Most companies that are serious about making money will choose from those three server brands due to their track record of reliability and support.
True enough. Not all though - the Intel server platform is certainly a high end offering, with an excellent track record, and so is Sun - but they are sold with no OS/Solaris/Linux, not Windows.