The answer to #2 is: HAVING Authors LIKE %SearchString% Thanks for the help... ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

some of the problem can be solved by single query, some of them are not possible in single queries if possible use multiple query

Thanks for the replys... I have error checking $u_result = @mysql_query($u_sql, $link_b); if (!$u_result) { exit(' Error reducing inventory: ' . mysql_error() . ' ');} There is no error thrown, just that value is not reduced. Like an idiot, when scrubbing my data, I probably should have left it... My invProdID has - marks in them, so I needed quotes around them. Total newb error. Thank you both anyway. You assurances that it seemed right made me think down the typo path. ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

Thank you both! ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

This is why I love codeproject. It should be a ulong. Thanks! ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

Dwayner79 wrote: Not sure if the last line is meant condescendingly Not at all. Too many people try and learn a language by experimenting, or reading a few things on the web, instead of really studying a book. A book tends to teach such stuff in a logic order, explaining how and why things are the way they are, and IMO there isn't really any alternative. And that's what I wanted to suggest. :) Luc Pattyn :badger: :jig: :badger: Have a look at my entry for the lean-and-mean competition; please provide comments, feedback, discussion, and don’t forget to vote for it! Thank you. :jig: :badger: :jig:

Both of you THANKS! and DUH on me. Many users will have notepad, but I know the particular user I am dealing with uses textpad. I wanted it to just call whatever is associated. Thanks again. ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

this.checksum

A alternative is to use bit shifting. To get the MSB you could shift the bits right by 15. eg msb = short >> 15; To get the LSB you can always use a bit mask, by using the bitwise AND operator on the short. eg. lsb = short & 0x0001;

Here is the answer in case it comes up in the future. Help.ShowHelp(this, helpProvider1.HelpNamespace, HelpNavigator.Topic, @"whateverthishappenstobe.html"); ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

You could use "manual refactoring". Just rename the class and compile. The list of compile errors are references to everywhere you use the class. Double click an error and you end up in the file with the name selected. Just paste in the new name. --- b { font-weight: normal; }

Can't you avoid calling ExitApp recursively? If not, I think the only way is to add a flag that is set to true when the "else" part executes for the first time and then conditionally skip execution from the next time. ExitFunction() { if (isRecursive) return; else isRecursive = true; if(userControl != null) { userControl.ExitFunction(); } else { //This is the issue??? See below } } Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro

Awesome. I hate going to ActiveX, but looks like I will have to. Thanks fo rthe recommendation. -Cheers ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

Great... thanks, I think I can get the rest... will write back if not. Cheers ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

Not really. It would be more like: using System; using System.Threading; using System.IO; namespace ConsoleTestApp { public class MyClass { private Timer timer; public static void Main(string\[\] args) { MyClass myClass = new MyClass(); timer.Interval=100; timer.Enabled=true; timer.Tick += new System.EventHandler(this.timer\_Tick); } public void timer\_Tick() { Foo1(); Foo2(); } private void Foo1() { lock(LockClass.LOCK\_OBJECT) { Console.WriteLine("Entered lock block in thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode()); Thread.Sleep(100); Console.WriteLine("Leaving lock block in thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode()); } } private void Foo2() { lock(LockClass.LOCK\_OBJECT) { Console.WriteLine("Entered lock block in thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode()); Thread.Sleep(200); Console.WriteLine("Leaving lock block in thread " + Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode()); } } } public class LockClass { public static readonly object LOCK\_OBJECT = new object(); } } This was typed so my syntax may not be exact. There is also no start and stop events. this is mainly to let you get the idea. As you can see it takes more time for the Foos to run that it takes for the timer to start the next tick. so the timer ticks and foo1 is started again while foo2 is still running. So instead of this... I am putting the following in the Timer code: public void timer_Tick() { try { timer.enabled = false; Foo1(); Foo2(); } finally { timer.enabled = true; } } It is a patch, but it works. I am uncertain of the TimerCallBack. I will spend tonight figuring out that. Perhaps I am not using the Timer properly. I must admit, I had/have little experience with the timers. The other problem is when I subscribe to an event: using System; using System.Threading; using System.IO; namespace ConsoleTestApp { public class MyClass { private Timer timer; private bool doStop1; private bool doStop2;

Sorry for the delay. I have been woring on the Mutex/ lock idea and almost have it working. I am intrigued however by the PInvoke method. Can you let me know what this is? I have found little information about it, and how it would apply to exitting a loop is escaping me. Thanks, Dwayne ***************** "We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —GW

As Peter says, you can use a Mutex. But if you don't need to synchronize between processes, you're better of using lock: public sealed class MyClass { internal void Foo() { lock(this) { // Access to this area is synchronized. } } internal void Bar() { lock(this) { // Access to this area is synchronized. } } } "God doesn't play dice" - Albert Einstein "God not only plays dice, He sometimes throws the dices where they cannot be seen" - Niels Bohr

I just ran your xml/xsl in cooktop and it gave me the correct result - Step Name: First step Cal sps 1 153 Cal sps 1 153 Cal sps 1 153 Step Name: another step Cal sps 1 153 Cal sps 1 153 Cal sps 1 153 ------ I did not see the DOC element in your xml - so the only change I made is: To me your loops should work the way you want!