No. You might want to look around on amazon's developer site for a forum there. "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

ok /\ |_ E X E GG

eggie5 wrote: Currently, this code will return immediately after the process is started. How can I modify it so that it will not return until the process has stopped? process.Start(); process.WaitForExit(); Share and enjoy. Sean

Doesn't XmlIgnore completely ignore the field without any exception? /\ |_ E X E GG

Hi, I've just decided to impliment a support layer that removes empty nodes. This is working now and I haven't found any issues with it: string ct = this.HttpWebResponse.Headers["Content-Type"]; if (ct.Contains("application/xml")) this.response_text = FilterOutEmptyNodes(this.response_text); } private string FilterOutEmptyNodes(string p) { //run regex to remove empty Ruby/Rails ActiveRecord nodes for C#/Asp.net compatability return System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(p, "<\[^>\]\*><\[^>\]\*>", ""); } /\ |_ E X E GG

To return a collection (list) of nodes, you need to use the SelectNodes function. Using your example XML, to return all of the Category nodes, you need to use the following XPath query: //Category. This tells the parser to find all of the "Category" nodes that are one level below the root node. Scott. —In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday. [Forum Guidelines] [Articles] [Blog]

No problem. I hope it helped. Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

You also haven't marked your inherited method as overrides (although i've spent all day coding in VB.net and may not have that quite right...)

Assuming that "categories" is your root XML element, then you can do the following: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Xml.Serialization; namespace WindowsApplication1 { [XmlRoot("categories")] public class categories : List<category> { } } When building your XmlSerializer, you need to specify "categories" as the type like so: XmlSerializer xs = new XmlSerializer(typeof(categories)); -- modified at 11:59 Monday 1st October, 2007 -- Had to escape out < Take care, Tom ----------------------------------------------- Check out my blog at http://tjoe.wordpress.com

Are you looking for something like this? public class ServiceResponse : WebResponse { public ServiceResponse ( HttpWebResponse resp ) : base ( resp ) { } }

I'm using sql server 2000, but I just found the property for cascading deletes under the relationships menu on my table. /\ |_ E X E GG

You must use a browser. Safari is a pig. Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.

Hi, when you use reflection, you can specify the scope of the things you are looking for. As an example, Type.GetMethods accepts a BindingsFlag, you may want to specify BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly to avoid inherited stuff. :) Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] this weeks tips: - make Visual display line numbers: Tools/Options/TextEditor/... - show exceptions with ToString() to see all information - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google

ender1988 wrote: how come they are rushing Vista SP1 through so fast? Because the DOJ forces them[^]

I don't even think that would work, Parent doesn't declare value. And the further problem would be if a child declares value as some unexpected type or not at all. The base class must either include the declaration of value or specify an abstract method either directly or via an interface.

Hi, how come GetFields doesn't pick up any public properties? /\ |_ E X E GG

eggie5 wrote: I somehow need to get the names of deriving class' public fields. Reflection? Yep, reflection would be the way to get the data. Custom attributes would come in handy too: class Person { [Column("AgeColumn")] public int Age; } Where TableFieldName is a custom attribute. Those may come in handy to get the corresponding table or column for a class or field. As the other poster noted, there are a lot of data access layers out there that do this. In the upcoming .NET 3.5, you'll have built-in support for this in the form of LINQ (language integrated query), and it's extension of LINQ-to-SQL and other databases. See Scott Guthrie's blog post on LINQ to SQL[^] for more info. Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Minnesota Bridge Collapses The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

Request.Path + "/assets/images/lumpydog.jpg" Parwej Ahamad g.parwez@gmail.com

Sure SELECT param1, param2, param3, param4, ISNULL(SourceVideoClip, '') FROM MyTable c.SourceVideoClip=reader.GetString(4).Trim(); only two letters away from being an asset

The issue isn't so much with the OP being unable to handle nulls in his code, but more to do with him looking for a simple way to handle them in the minimum amount of code. Now, nulls definitely cause some contention - they almost seem to cause religious hysteria among developers. At their most basic, they are useful for identifying the absence of a value. Suppose that you wanted to capture if a person was married or not, it is valid to have three conditions; Yes, No and Unkown (or null). This could be because somebody didn't ask the question so you don't know whether or not they are. Oh well, that's enough rambling about nulls. It's time for me to go get a life again. Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.