The binary I posted is actually one of the responses of "Group 2" above. The point being, if the block of binary "says" anything, then by default "Group 1" must admit that it's a programming language. If it does not "say" anything and is just random gibberish, then it's not a language.

010000100110010100100000011100110111010101110010011001 010010000001110100011011110010000001100100011100100110 100101101110011010110010000001111001011011110111010101 110010001000000100111101110110011000010110110001110100 01101001011011100110010100101110

Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!