Ger Hayden wrote: Kvaser Ger Hayden wrote: there is better out there Yes, but it costs several thousand dollars and you don't want to end in the V***or business model, trust me. Pcap is the cheaper one and the one I would go for home projects, Kvaser has the advantage of being actually used by a sizeable (as far as I know 10%, which in a otherwise monopolistic environment is a lot) amount of OEMs including Ferrari. There should also be some free native library, with a few pinvoke you should be able to use them easily. For troubleshooting I would go to suites designed for that, and Kvaser has one (again, you don't want CAN***zer unless you want to spend thousand of dollars and be tied for life to Vek***). GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

And you should be using Zorin OS[^] as it is: Made with ☘️ in Ireland :-\

Just sort your phone's drawer by install date, and check it after anyone else has had possession of it. And install a firewall (if your phone isn't rooted, use something like No-root Firewall[^]) All good security needs, after all, is a modicum of common sense. I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

DerekT-P wrote: ... and people have got bigger since then, too. (For one thing, there are now many many female MPs who tend to have wider hips) Her underwear looked like a dress for someone with two waists? CQ de W5ALT Walt Fair, Jr.PhD P. E. Comport Computing Specializing in Technical Engineering Software

This is the rollback I was referring to (from the CP article): using (var scope = new TransactionScope()) { //either 1 of following lines will use Transaction.Current.Rollback(); scope.Dispose(); //if you comment the following line transaction will //automatically be rolled back //scope.Complete(); } Ger

it looks like we had a short burst of database issues just when you tried to post the question. There were a number of errors just associated with you. It seems to have corrected itself, but I'm going to investigate anyways. "Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."

Good on you! Congrats for sticking with it and being successful! Looking forward to the tip/trick post. :D #SupportHeForShe Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun

I really like what it offers and it is not a difficult concept to harness. It is beyond belief that it has been so problematic. I had intended promoting it to my employer when we introduced api add ons in the spring but held back due to not having a working example of how I did it. Ger

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: I am not sure why you didn't read the documentation for this tool, Microsoft had already made it pretty much clear that this tool is not for "securely storing your credentials", rather "storing your secure credentials". There is a huge difference, Chances are I missed it when reading it, although I'm not sure whoose documentation I read on the subject so it might not even have been mentioned. Either way it was lost on me. Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: They are merely encrypted, anyone who has access to your machine—since this data is in your machine—has access to that database, This is why I move away from database storage in the first place. Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: For example, on Microsoft Azure you should use Azure KeyVault And this is the real value in your response. :thumbsup: Ger

You still have options: - edit the question and add further information. - reply to the person(s) who have already responded with some feedback or requests for more assistance.

Not a problem. I did not see your other questions but from the two I did saw, I would suggest you to make things as simple as possible for us to understand. You have been working on a certain requirement for a while and that would affect you choice of words while framing a question. However, you need to understand that people at CP do not know your requirements so they will need to know what you are looking for in a very simple way. For instance, I can frame a question like How to disable response access for benutzer when verwalter changes audit entry field? In my mind this is perfect question as I am aware of requirements. But I might not get many responses. Instead, I might choose to ask the same thing probably like this: We have an ASP.Net MVC based application. The administrator can make changes to live application which affect the UI. How to send those changes to connected users in real time? Perhaps server push? This should follow with a simple and to the point code sample showing what I have tried already and also explaining the approach I am try to go with. Don't hold me accountable if even the second one does not make sense. :cool: "It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[^]

Conspiracy? This is a "conspiracy" https://iaero.me/mcchecker What is YOUR definition of it?

Actually I believe in this case I removed it because there was no answer. If a question gets reported (for whatever reason) and a week has passed by, it is unlikely the question will be answered and we remove it. Thanks, Sean Ewington CodeProject

She can't: the website crashed[^] Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Well - it certainly looks like Down will go down[^] this year

For all your offshore banking needs ;)