from what i see, code is not wrapped in a try catch block. you also don't close the connection, and rdr.NextResult is not needed since rdr.Read() enumerates through set in a DataReader. plus ur opening the connection before ur setting cmd fields. try this cn = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(ConnectionString); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(); cmd.Connection = cn; cmd.CommandText = "spResSupervisorSwitchboard"; cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; try{ SqlDataReader rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader(); while(rdr.Read()) { lblWaitingFirstEntry.Text = rdr[0].ToString(); } }catch(SqlException ex) { lblWaitingFirstEntry.Text = ex.ToString(); } finally { con.close(); }

There is a TabIndex, but not Tab Order option on the Edit menu, like in Windows Forms. You click that and then you get a lot of little boxes with numbers identifying current tab order and you click on them to change the tab order. ;)

You can find some info on antlr page which is a really good parser generator tool for C#: http://www.antlr.org I have few examples on my web page on using antrl: http://www.adersoftware.com/?page=compilers I have also an example there that doesn't use parser generator, but uses hand coded top-down recursive descent parser.

Oh yeah, many of them. And if you have family with kids, can be a real pain :mad: Pankaj Without struggle, there is no progress

like this one BW CP Member Homepages "...take what you need and leave the rest..."

I met a dutch girl the other day with inflatable shoes, she gave me her number and I would have given her a call but I was too late... she'd popped her cloggs. David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum Putting the laughter back into slaughter

Yes, but we learnt things the hard way and we can say that we are the SAS or Navy SEALs of computing. :cool: Take, for example, these kids today. :sigh: I can bet 80% of them don't know what 3 1/2" floppy disk looks like, and lets not mention 5 1/4" ones. Can anyone remember the beauty of running pkzip.exe and pkunzip.exe at the command prompt? Damn, this nostalgia is going to kill me. :-D But one thing I would like to hear again is Wolf3D sound through PC Speaker.;)

Husein wrote: Once I read somewhere (and I really don't know where) that software, being an intelectual property, should be looked at the methods developed, time taken to develop the methods and some other things, multiplied buy some third thing, and when you add everything together you you would get the approximate price. Well, if the only variables you have are the development costs, you'll end up having only a cost assessment. Anything that is bigger than your costs will give you profit. There's no such a thing as a "fair price". IMHO, the determining variable for your software's price is how much value your customer sees on it, no matter how much effort you put on it. As a sample, two extremes: Software A: Done in 3 days, poorly documented, buggy, ugly, lots of features are missing. You were the only programmer on the project. But it saves half a million dollars per day, if used by your customers. Your customers nor your competitors have no idea on how to create such a software. Software B: Done in 3 years, throughly documented and tested, design by Pininfarina, every possible feature is implemented. It needed a 80 programmer effort. But there are another 432 competitors in the market, all cheap, selling their software for $20. The software doesn't save the customer a cent. Which software do you think the customer will pay more? So, function point counting or estimation (I think it's what you referring to), is only used when you are doing custom development, i.e., you're only making a development task for someone. But, for determining the price of a product it helps nothing. Trying to make bits uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. -- Bruce Schneier By the way, dog_spawn isn't a nickname - it is my name with an underscore instead of a space. -- dog_spawn

I don't know which browser you're using, but on IE6 it works fine. One thing, though, is different - there's no 'go' button near the combo box. Making a selection from the combo box automatically redirects the browser to the selected forum. If I'm impatient and click the IE 'Go" button up above before the redirection occurs it returns the current page, of course. That's what it's supposed to do. "Your village called - They're missing their idiot."